Hi Fränzi,
mod.sum <- summary(model)
mod.sum @ sigma
Hank
On Aug 18, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Fränzi Korner wrote:
Hi Oliver
you once asked this question at the R help list.
Hi all,
I try to fit a glmm model with binomial distribution and I would to
verify that the scale parameter is close to
Sweet - works like a charm. Thanks!
Hank
On Aug 12, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Henrique Dallazuanna wrote:
The try this:
form <- as.formula('x\u007ey')
lm(form)
On 8/12/08, Martin Henry H. Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Henrique. We need to use the tilde in formula statem
t;\u00D1")
On 8/12/08, Martin Henry H. Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was trying to help someone who used a spanish keyboard on a PC
running
Windows. he discovered that he had no tilde key. Does anyone know
of any
simple work-arounds?
Thanks,
Hank
Dr. Hank Stevens, Associa
I was trying to help someone who used a spanish keyboard on a PC
running Windows. he discovered that he had no tilde key. Does anyone
know of any simple work-arounds?
Thanks,
Hank
Dr. Hank Stevens, Associate Professor
338 Pearson Hall
Botany Department
Miami University
Oxford, OH 45056
Offic
Hi John,
1. I do not know why you remove the intercept in the lme model, but
keep it in the aov model.
2. The distributional assumptions are shot --- you can't run any sort
of normal model with these data. You might consider some sort of
binomial (metabolite detected vs. not detected).
Hank
Hi hpdutra,
I do not know what section of which Crawley book you are referring
to, but I assume that Crawley's point is to use a binomial error
distribution (logistic regression) rather than a normal model. It is
generally thought that LaPlace methods are more accurate than PQL
methods.
H
Hi Sam,
I don't understand how you can estimate a separate id variance other
than the residual variance, with one observation per subject. I would
think the proper model would be
glm(y ~ 1, family='poisson)
Cheers,
Hank
On Oct 15, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Sam Field wrote:
> Group,
>
> I have count
7 matches
Mail list logo