you may have noticed.
Best regards,
Kengo
2015-05-28 4:26 GMT-05:00 peter dalgaard :
>
> On 28 May 2015, at 00:06 , Kengo Inagaki wrote:
>
>> I did not understand complete separation quite well..
>> Thank you very much for clarification.
>>
>> Kengo
>&
On May 27, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Kengo Inagaki wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much for your rapid response. I sincerely appreciate your
>> input.
>> I am sorry for sending the previous email in HTML format.
>>
>> with(a, table(Sex, Therapy1) ) shows the followin
appreciate comments.
Kengo Inagaki
Memphis, TN
2015-05-27 13:57 GMT-05:00 David Winsemius :
>
> On May 27, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Kengo Inagaki wrote:
>
>> I am currently working on a health care related project using R. I am
>> learning R while working on data analysis.
>>
I did not understand complete separation quite well..
Thank you very much for clarification.
Kengo
2015-05-27 17:03 GMT-05:00 David Winsemius :
>
> On May 27, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Kengo Inagaki wrote:
>
>> Here is the result-
>>
>>> with(a, table(Sex, Therapy1, Out
I am currently working on a health care related project using R. I am
learning R while working on data analysis.
Below is the part of the data in which i am encountering a problem.
Case#Sex Therapy1 Therapy2 Outcome
1 male no
no
5 matches
Mail list logo