Re: [R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence with multiple factors

Michael, so you're suggesting that I should do: aux <- interaction( Topology, Drift, lambda) and then fligner.test(dT~aux) Is that correct? On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Michael Dewey aghmed.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: > At 16:03 17/09/2008, Javier Acuña wrote: >> >> H

Re: [R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence, with multiple factors

>Ben Bolker ufl.edu> writes: > >I would try > >fligner.test(dT ~ Topology:Drift:lambda) > >in response to: > >Javier Acuna gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so > please bear with me if this is a silly question. > > I'm trying to assess wheth

[R] Unexpected behaviour when testing for independence with multiple factors

Hi, I'm a new user of R. My background is Electrical Engineering, so please bear with me if this is a silly question. I'm trying to assess whether the results of an experiment satisfy the hypothesis of homoscedasticity (my ultimate goal is to use ANOVA). The result of the experiment is mean delay