Ok.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 12-03-11 4:30 PM, Eduardo Mendes wrote:
>
>> Dear Prof. Ripley
>>
>> Many thanks. rtools 2.15 did the job.
>>
>> One note if I may - In the rtools site one reads
>>
>> rtools215.ex
Dear Prof. Ripley
Many thanks. rtools 2.15 did the job.
One note if I may - In the rtools site one reads
rtools215.exe - r>2.14.1 to R 2.15.x No
rtoosl214.exe - r 2.13.x or R.2.14.x yes
which can mislead the reader. 2.14.x could mean 2.14.2 and "no" could mean
that rtools-2.15 is not read for
Hello
I have recently installed R 2.14.2 on a brand new pc running Windows 64.
One of things I would like to do is to recompile my R package (with C and
fortran source codes) for this new environment (it works on a mac and on a
linux box). To this end, I had rtools 2.14 downloaded and installed (
Hello
Many thanks for the replies.
I am note sure whether you've got what you meant (Prof. Ripley) but here is
the output of Sys.getlocale()
> Sys.getlocale()[1] "LC_COLLATE=English_United
> States.1252;LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252;LC_MONETARY=English_United
> States.1252;LC_NUMERIC=C;L
it works on my mac or windows).
I am not sure if this is what you meant but as I have no clue what
.First.lib does or NAMESPACES means this is the best I come up with.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Many thanks
Ed
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
>
> On
Dear R-users
I am slowly migrating my mex files (MATLAB - Fortran and C) to R. To get my
own functions available on R section I have decided to learn how to build a
R package. I choose a simple example with a few Fortran and R functions
(wrapper).
The fortran sources are located at src and the
Many thanks.
The "still untested" worked.
Cheers
Ed
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:23 AM, David Winsemius wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2011, at 10:21 AM, David Winsemius wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Eduardo Mendes wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>>
Winsemius wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Eduardo Mendes wrote:
>
> Dear R-Users
>>
>> I have the following matrix
>>
>> out$desc [,1][,2]
>>>
>> [1,] "" ""
>> [2,] "y
Dear R-Users
I have the following matrix
> out$desc [,1][,2]
[1,] "" ""
[2,] "y_{01}(k-001)" ""
[3,] "y_{01}(k-002)" ""
[4,] "y_{01}(k-003)" ""
[5,] "u_{01}(k-001)" ""
[6,] "u_{01}(k-002)" ""
[7,] "u_{01}(k-003)" ""
[8,] "y_{01}(k-001)" "y_{01}(k-001)"
[9,]
Hello
I think you are right. Includegraphics outside od R chunck seems to avoid
unnecessary float space.
Many thanks
Ed.
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Duncan Mackay wrote:
> Hi Eduardo
>
> I have just realized that I did not my send previous message to r-help
>
> You do not need to put it
Hi there
Would you be so kind to send an example, please?
Many thanks
Ed
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Duncan Mackay wrote:
> Hi
>
> The are three places where the size of the graphs can be customised
> 1 Sweave with options
> 2 R in the device
> 3 Latex specifying dimensions or set scale=
Hello
Many thanks for the replies.
Solution 1 (landscape package) works but the output figure is kind of small.
Solution2: includegraphics outside - Unfortunately it does not work.
Includegraphics cannot find Myfig.
Solution 3- \usepackage[figureright]{rotating} works and the output figure
is
Hello again
I do apologize for the previous email without any useful information that
can lead to an answer. To those who felt offended by "to no avail", I do
apologize again. I guess I will be always a newbie as far as R is
concerned.
The date format was wrong and although I have tried to us
13 matches
Mail list logo
