x[,i],
main=paste(mainlabel,predictor[i],mainlabel2),ylab=paste(ylabel),cex.lab=cexalabel,cex.main=cexmlabel,cex.axis=1.5)
}
-------
Bernd Panassiti
National Institute of Public Health & the Environment (RIVM)
Laboratory fo
hello Gavin,
yes, you might be right. I performed a comparison of a normal NMDS
(with metaMDS) and a
subsequent rotation with varimax. The rotation didn't seem to improve
significantly the
the alignment of the former ordination output.
Thanks for your hint & greetings.
Bernd
hello,
thanks a lot for your help.
@ Stephen: In my opinion the proscrutes rotation is more used to
compare the
alignment of different ordination methods. But maybe I'm wrong.
@ Bill: Thanks for the comprehensive description. That was the
information I was
looking for.
Greetings,
hello,
subsequently to a NMDS analysis (performed with metaMDS or isoMDS) is
it possible to
rotate the axis through a varimax-rotation?
Thanks in advance.
Bernd Panassiti
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r
4 matches
Mail list logo