Hi there,
I have a vector and would like to create a data frame, which contains
all unique combination of two elements, regardless of order.
myVec <- c(1,2,3)
what expand.grid does:
1,1
1,2
1,3
2,1
2,2
2,3
3,1
3,2
3,3
what I would like to have
1,1
1,2
1,3
2,2
2,3
3,3
Can anybody help?
_
Thanks a lot! That's what I was looking for :-)
A
On 19 March 2011 13:56, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 11-03-19 8:18 AM, Antje Niederlein wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> probably there is a very simple solution, but I cannot think of one...
>>
>>
Hi there,
probably there is a very simple solution, but I cannot think of one...
I have a vector with values:
data <- c(1,6,3,4,8,4,2,9)
and I have a vector with bin breaks:
bins <- c(1,3,5,7,9,11)
Now, I'd like to get for each data point the index of the bin-vector
where the value falls in (
y look
> but you need to post data so people can determine if they
> can produce and fix your problem. Any complaints
> about bad/ singular matricies are likely to depend on data
> being bad in some way.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15 March 2011
Anybody who can help me with this issue?
On 15 March 2011 14:15, Antje Niederlein wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I try to model some dose response curves (drc-package). In most cases
> it is fine but now I got some data which produces me the following
> error:
>
> load("drm
Hi there,
I try to model some dose response curves (drc-package). In most cases
it is fine but now I got some data which produces me the following
error:
load("drmData.RData")
library(drc)
drmObj <- drm(value ~ concentration, cmpd_respvar, data = drmData, fct = LL.4())
predict(drmObj)
>> Error
9
>>
>
> ---
>
> In principle, the lower bound (10) for the width option could be
> lowered a bit more, as I think 10 had been a somewhat arbitrary
> choice protecting useRs from hanging themselves..
>
> Martin
>
>
> > Ted.
>
> > On 21-Feb-11 10
Hi there,
I though there has been a possibility to force the output on the
console with one element per line. Instead of this:
> 1:10
[1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
something like this
> 1:10
[1] 1
[2] 2
[3] 3
[4] 4
[5] 5
[6] 6
[7] 7
[8] 8
[9] 9
[10] 10
Can anybody help
things
and I'm not sure whether I got it right how to find the ML-function of
a more complex distribution...
Antje
On 11 February 2011 10:14, Ingmar Visser wrote:
> Antje,
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Antje Niederlein
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ingmar, hi Dennis,
&g
ML estimate of lambda is the mean, so no need for (iterative)
> optimization. See eg:
> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MaximumLikelihood.html
> hth, Ingmar
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Antje Niederlein
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I tried to fit a pois
Hello,
I tried to fit a poisson distribution but looking at the function
fitdistr() it does not optimize lambda but simply estimates the mean
of the data and returns it as lambda. I'm a bit confused because I was
expecting an optimization of this parameter to gain a good fit...
If I would use mle(
ke in how
to use mle() correctly.
I think, I'll look into Bens mle2() method and figure out whether this
is a more elegant way :-)
Ciao,
Antje
On 7 February 2011 21:39, Ben Bolker wrote:
> Antje Niederlein yahoo.de> writes:
>
>>
>> A few day ago, I was looking f
A few day ago, I was looking for an answer to my question but didn't
get one. Anybody who can help now?
Hello,
I tried to use mle to fit a distribution(zero-inflated negbin for
count data). My call is very simple:
mle(ll)
ll() takes the three parameters, I'd like to be estimated (size, mu
and
Hello,
is there somebody who can help me with my question (see below)?
Antje
> On 1 February 2011 09:09, Antje Niederlein wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I tried to use mle to fit a distribution(zero-inflated negbin for
>> count data). My call is very simple:
&
Hello,
is there somebody who can help me with my question (see below)?
Antje
On 1 February 2011 09:09, Antje Niederlein wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I tried to use mle to fit a distribution(zero-inflated negbin for
> count data). My call is very simple:
>
> mle(ll)
>
Hello,
I tried to use mle to fit a distribution(zero-inflated negbin for
count data). My call is very simple:
mle(ll)
ll() takes the three parameters, I'd like to be estimated (size, mu
and prob). But within the ll() function I have to judge if the current
parameter-set gives a nice fit or not.
Hi Ben,
thanks a lot for your answer.
> There are four reasonable solutions to your problems:
>
> 1. ignore the warnings, as long as they are all of the
> same type (NaNs/NAs being produced by dbinom or dpois),
> and as long as the final results look sensible.
probably fine for me. The fit for
Hi Ben,
thanks a lot for your answer.
> There are four reasonable solutions to your problems:
>
> 1. ignore the warnings, as long as they are all of the
> same type (NaNs/NAs being produced by dbinom or dpois),
> and as long as the final results look sensible.
probably fine for me. The fit for
Hi there,
I'm pretty new to the field of fitting (anything). I try to fit a
distribution with mle, because my real data seems to follow a
zero-inflated poisson distribution. So far, I tried a simple example
to see whether I understand how to do it or not:
# example count data
x <- 0:10
y <- dpois
19 matches
Mail list logo