On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 10:08 AM Spencer Graves
wrote:
>
> TWO COMMENTS:
>
>
> 1. DID YOU ASSIGN THE OUTPUT OF "optim" to an object, like "est <-
> optim(...)"? If yes and if "optim" terminated normally, the 60,000+
> paramters should be there as est$par. See the documentation on "optim".
>
>
>
TWO COMMENTS:
1. DID YOU ASSIGN THE OUTPUT OF "optim" to an object, like "est <-
optim(...)"? If yes and if "optim" terminated normally, the 60,000+
paramters should be there as est$par. See the documentation on "optim".
2. WHAT PROBLEM ARE YOU TRYING TO SOLVE?
I hope you will forg
optim() has no method really suitable for very large numbers of parameters.
- CG as set up has never worked very well in any of its implementations
(I wrote it, so am allowed to say so!). Rcgmin in optimx package works
better, as does Rtnmin. Neither are really intended for 60K parameters
ho
Calculate fewer of them?
If you don't setup your code to save intermediate results, then you cannot see
intermediate results.
On March 11, 2021 8:32:17 PM PST, "毕芳妮 via R-help" wrote:
>Dear list,
>I am using optim() to estimate over 60 thousans of parameters, and use
>the server to run the pro
Dear list,
I am using optim() to estimate over 60 thousans of parameters, and use the
server to run the program.But it took me 5 hours and there was just no result
coming out.How could I do to show some results that have been calculated by
optim()?
_
On 12/03/2021 12:37 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12/03/2021 12:13 p.m., xiaoyan yu wrote:
I am writing C++ program based on R extensions and also try to test the
program with google address sanitizer.
I thought if we don't protect the variable from the allocation API such as
Rf_allocVector, t
On 12/03/2021 12:13 p.m., xiaoyan yu wrote:
I am writing C++ program based on R extensions and also try to test the
program with google address sanitizer.
I thought if we don't protect the variable from the allocation API such as
Rf_allocVector, there will be a memory leak. However, the address
This is the wrong list for such questions. Post to r-devel instead.
Cheers,
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 9:13 AM xiaoya
I am writing C++ program based on R extensions and also try to test the
program with google address sanitizer.
I thought if we don't protect the variable from the allocation API such as
Rf_allocVector, there will be a memory leak. However, the address sanitizer
didn't report it. Is my understandin
Thank you so much everyone for your time and help! I really appreciate it.
Kind Regards,
Areti
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:34 PM Rasmus Liland wrote:
> That is such a nice email crammed with
> useful info I'm sure Areti Panopoulou
> appreciates. JR
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]
Hi Petr,
In principle, I like David's approach the best.
However, I note that there's a bug in the squared step.
Furthemore, the variance of the sample quantiles should increase as
they move away from the modal region.
I've built on David's approach, but changed it to a two stage
optimization alg
11 matches
Mail list logo