It is. I will try their mailing list :)
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:56 PM Bert Gunter wrote:
> Isn't this a Bioconductor package? If so, shouldn't you be posting on
> their website instead of here?
> (Apologies if I'm mistaken).
>
>
> Bert Gunter
>
> "The trouble with having an open mind is that p
Isn't this a Bioconductor package? If so, shouldn't you be posting on their
website instead of here?
(Apologies if I'm mistaken).
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County"
I thought it successfully loaded after library(Biobase) but after
implementing your suggested I got the following
Error in library(Biobase) : there is no package called ‘Biobase’
So to download it would I try to rerun with Debug? This is an option given
as part of the return
On Wed, Jul 17
Are you remembering to attach the Biobase package to your R session?
> AnnotatedDataFrame()
Error in AnnotatedDataFrame() :
could not find function "AnnotatedDataFrame"
> suppressPackageStartupMessages({ library(Biobase) })
> AnnotatedDataFrame()
An object of class 'AnnotatedDataFrame': none
Bi
Hi,
I managed to transfer my object trough dput/dget and a text file export. I will
look into stripping the function for the reprex creation when I have more time
(this is a ginormous function)...
Thanks to your input and Bert's
- Original Message -
From: "Duncan Murdoch"
To: "Seba
Good evening,
I downloaded the Biobase package in order to utilize the ExpressionSet and
other features hosted there to examine annotations for probeset data, which
I seek to visualize. I currently have pre-analyzed object located in my
environment containing said probeset info, along with gene id
On 17/07/2019 2:02 p.m., Sebastien Bihorel wrote:
Hi,
Indeed the S4 object is a class provided by a contributed package. However, the
windows machine that reads the .rds fine does not even have the package
installed.
I also confirm that I used readRDS (loadRDS was a typo on my part, sorry).
Hi,
Indeed the S4 object is a class provided by a contributed package. However, the
windows machine that reads the .rds fine does not even have the package
installed.
I also confirm that I used readRDS (loadRDS was a typo on my part, sorry).
In this case, I cannot provide a reprex as the contr
Hi,
Yes, I tried save/load... same failure.
But I did not yet try dump/source or dput/dget. I will
From: "Bert Gunter"
To: "Sebastien Bihorel"
Cc: "R-help"
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 10:27:24 AM
Subject: Re: [R] Problem with save/load across R versions and OS
Did you try plain sa
On 17/07/2019 4:39 a.m., Sebastien Bihorel wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to transfer an S4 object from a machine working with CentOS 7.2 / R 3.4.3 to
another one running Linux Mint 19 / R 3.6.0. If I save the object using saveRDS in
obj.rds, loadRDS returns an "unknown input format" error on my Linux
Did you try plain save/load ??
Also ?dump/source
?dput/dget
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 1:38 AM Sebastien Bihorel <
se
I think that would depend on whether the bug was in the install program or not.
In this case I would not bet on that being the problem.
I would either look for a patched release that addresses the bug, or roll back
to 3.5.3. You might have luck with 3.6.0, but given that was when the major
feat
What might be the likely outcomes of an attempt to reinstall 3.6.1?
And might that depend on whether the current 3.6.1 was
uninstalled first?
Spencer
On 2019-07-17 07:17, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
It would never make sense for such messages to reflect normal and
expected ope
It would never make sense for such messages to reflect normal and expected
operation, so hypothesizing about intentionally changing stack behavior doesn't
make sense.
The default format for saveRDS changed in 3.6.0. There may be bugs associated
with that, but rolling back to 3.6.0 would just tr
Did something seriously change in R 3.6.1 at least for Windows in terms of
stack impacts?
I'm encountering many problems with the 00UNLOCK, needing to disable locking
during installations.
And I'm encountering
> Error: C stack usage 63737888 is too close to the limit
for cases I did not be
Hi,
I am trying to transfer an S4 object from a machine working with CentOS 7.2 / R
3.4.3 to another one running Linux Mint 19 / R 3.6.0. If I save the object
using saveRDS in obj.rds, loadRDS returns an "unknown input format" error on my
Linux Mint machine. Interestingly enough, obj.rds loads
16 matches
Mail list logo
