Re: [R] RStudio Exploratory Factor Analysis: write a function that extracts an increasing number of factors

2018-07-23 Thread Rui Barradas
Hello, The output of kable() is a character vector, so you can solve your problem with a regex. res <- do.call("rbind", efas) %>% kable() res2 <- sub("^\\|[^|]+(\\|.*)", "\\1", res) head(res2) Alternatively, a more tidyverse like way would be to pipe the output of kable() through sub().

[R] RStudio Exploratory Factor Analysis: write a function that extracts an increasing number of factors

2018-07-23 Thread michael matta
I have been trying to write a function in Rstudio that extracts an increasing number of latent factors for the EFA and reports fit measures for each solution in a final table. Below, I pasted what I was able to come up with. Unfortunately, it has some critical limitations: The for loop requires t

Re: [R] Automate running files in R

2018-07-23 Thread Michael Friendly
Hi Serena I'll add one more "in addition" to this list of suggestions. It may not be what you were thinking of, but may be far simpler in the long run. The complexity of your approach comes from having separate data files for each subject and trial, for which you have to have a convention for

Re: [R] [bug] spdep package?

2018-07-23 Thread Jeremie Juste
Many thanks for the info. I see the point but I'll think calling the spData would be a cheaper price to pay. If each package one load provide access to their variables things are likely to get messy. I guess many R users would like to control the variables in their global environment. And sinc

Re: [R] [FORGED] [bug] spdep package?

2018-07-23 Thread Jeremie Juste
Hello, >This is *very* unlikely to be a bug. People should always exercise a >great deal of caution about conjecturing bugs when they encounter a >phenomenon that they don't understand. Ok, I over reacted and I should let the package maintainers qualify what is a bug or not. My point is that

Re: [R] [bug] spdep package?

2018-07-23 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
This is intended/expected because the spdep package *depends* on the spData package (see https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spdep/), which means that the maintainer of spdep intends also spData to be *attached* whenever spdep is attached.If they would have only imported it, then spData wou

Re: [R] [bug] spdep package?

2018-07-23 Thread Jeremie Juste
Helllo, Thanks for the info. I still think these variables should not be loaded when library(spdep) is called. But I'll handle it following your suggestion. Thanks, Jeremie > It turns out that that 'x' comes from the spData package and lives > inside that package (part of its namespace)

[R] pROC

2018-07-23 Thread Maria Enzian
Hello, I'm using the package pROC in RStudio to create my ROC-curves and I have patients in my data - healthy or sick - in the column "Status" and the value "SUVmax" to examine it. I used the following code: plot.roc(daten$Status,daten$SUVmax,percent=TRUE,ci=TRUE,print.auc=TRUE,main="ROC-Kurve

Re: [R] [FORGED] [bug] spdep package?

2018-07-23 Thread Rolf Turner
On 23/07/18 22:30, Jeremie Juste wrote: Hello, I found a dangerous issue in the library spdep. I get variables x and y that cannot be removed by rm() and I don't don't how they show up. Can anyone reproduce this? I cannot. This is *very* unlikely to be a bug. People should always exercise

Re: [R] [bug] spdep package?

2018-07-23 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
It turns out that that 'x' comes from the spData package and lives inside that package (part of its namespace). > spData::x [1] 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 This is conceptually no different from other objects in package namespace, although we are more used to

[R] [bug] spdep package?

2018-07-23 Thread Jeremie Juste
Hello, I found a dangerous issue in the library spdep. I get variables x and y that cannot be removed by rm() and I don't don't how they show up. Can anyone reproduce this? ~$ R --vanilla > rm(list=ls()) > library(spdep) > x [1] 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450