The package appears to be referenced in the package "agridat" -
ftp://cran.r-project.org/pub/R/web/packages/agridat/agridat.pdf (Pg 55).
However, even I tried searching for it and there seems to be no reference other
than this source.
Regards,
radmuzom
From: R-help on behalf of David Winsemiu
On 05/07/18 10:21, Nelly Reduan wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to generate N random numbers with a given probability and
condition but I'm not sure how to do this.
For example, I have N = 20 and the vector from which to choose is seq(0, 10,
1). I have tested:
x <- sample(seq(0, 10, 1), 20,
This looks like homework (which is off topic here per the Posting Guide). Also,
please send your emails in plain text format to avoid us seeing your message
differently than you do.
On July 4, 2018 3:21:34 PM PDT, Nelly Reduan wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I would like to generate N random numbers with
Dear all,
I would like to generate N random numbers with a given probability and
condition but I'm not sure how to do this.
For example, I have N = 20 and the vector from which to choose is seq(0, 10,
1). I have tested:
x <- sample(seq(0, 10, 1), 20, replace=TRUE, prob=rep(0.28, times=length(se
Thank you, Peter!
Sincerely,
KeithC.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>> # Extract SEs via vcov()
>> SEvcov1<-exp(coef(fit1)) *sqrt(diag(vcov(fit1)))
>> SEvcov2<-exp(coef(fit2))*sqrt(diag(vcov(fit2)))
>
> What makes you think that you need to multiply with exp(coef()) he
It is not obvious that this is an error. If your nominal variable in SAS has a
level which is not present in data, then R might just be making a faithful
translation. There is a distinction between (a) having a gender variable with
two levels of which 0 females and (b) pretending that male is th
Hi,
I have imported some sasdata into R using the sas7bdat package. I have some
nominal variables with some missing values.
R is creating a new level which is emty ��.When I ask for tabulate this new
level is presented with 0 as a frequency.
I want to get rid of this level and have my file imp
I've been following this thread, and wondering where it might lead.
My (possibly naive) view of these matters is basically logical,
relying on (possibly over-simplified) interpretaions of "NA" and "NaN".
These are that:
"NaN" means "Not a Number", though it can result from a
numerical calculatio
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 6:34 PM, Mehrshad Barary wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Does anybody know how I can get ASExtras library?
It would be helpful if you would provide information about your reasons for
assuming this package's existence. Cannot find it in CRAN (including a search
for 'ASExtra'
I'm having deja-vu of a similar discussion on R-devel:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2018-July/076377.html
This was the funniest inconsistency I could find:
> sum(c(NaN,NA))
[1] NaN
> sum(NaN,NA)
[1] NA
THEY'RE IN THE SAME ORDER!!!
The doc in ?NaN has this clause:
In R, basi
> # Extract SEs via vcov()
> SEvcov1<-exp(coef(fit1)) *sqrt(diag(vcov(fit1)))
> SEvcov2<-exp(coef(fit2))*sqrt(diag(vcov(fit2)))
What makes you think that you need to multiply with exp(coef()) here???
-pd
> On 4 Jul 2018, at 11:08 , 1/k^c wrote:
>
> Hi R-helpers,
>
> I was working with som
Hi R-helpers,
I was working with some count data using gamlss() and glm(), and
noticed that the standard errors from the two functions correspond
when extracting from either the model summary for both functions, or
using vcov for both functions, but the standard errors between those
methods do not
12 matches
Mail list logo