[Rd] Eilig Geschaftsvorschlag (PR#7945)

2005-06-15 Thread thomas
Thomas Mandino(Rechnungprüfer bei der Imperial Bank von Süd Afrika). Ich kam zu ihrem kontakt in meiner persönlichen suche nach einer zuverlassigen und anstandige person,um eine sehr vertrauliche verhandlung zu erledigen,die,die übertragung von einem fremden Konto das maximale zuversicht erfordert. Der

Re: [Rd] source bug ? (PR#7929)

2005-06-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
too work. for this too happen r > needs to be configured in the following way > > ./configure --enable-R-shlib > The R for Mac OS X FAQ tells you how to configure. You do need the --with-blas='-framework vecLib' --with-lapack flags that it lists. -thomas

Re: [Rd] Citation for R

2005-06-13 Thread Thomas Lumley
ftware might provide a solution, since JSS *does* publish software. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

[Rd] (no subject)

2005-06-13 Thread Thomas Lumley
Online registration for DSC 2005 in Seattle, August 13-14 is now open. See the conference web page at http://depts.washington.edu//dsc2005/ -thomas Thomas Lumley Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Washington, Seattle

[Rd] DSC 2005

2005-06-13 Thread Thomas Lumley
Persons conversant with W3C standards would have noticed too many // in the URL quoted in my previous message. The correct conference page URL is http://depts.washington.edu/dsc2005 -thomas On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Thomas Lumley wrote: > > Online registration for DSC 2005 in S

Re: [Rd] Open device -> glibc 2.3.4 bug for Redhat Enterprise 4?

2005-06-21 Thread Thomas Lumley
This was supposed to be fixed in 2.1.1 -- which version are you using? -thomas On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Martin Maechler wrote: > We have been using Redhat Enterprise 4, on some of our Linux > clients for a while, > and Christoph has just found that opening an R device for a file

Re: [Rd] Open device -> glibc 2.3.4 bug for Redhat Enterprise 4?

2005-06-21 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> "TL" == Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:59:31 -0700 (PDT) writes: > >TL> This was supposed to be fixed in 2.1.1 -- which version are you u

Re: [Rd] segmentation fault after max level of parenthesis (PR#7990)

2005-07-04 Thread Thomas Lumley
Already fixed, I believe. -thomas On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Matthias Laabs > Version: 2.1.0 (source compiled) > OS: debian linux (sarge) > Submission from: (NULL) (195.143.236.2) > > > Hi! > R crashes with a segmentation fault

Re: [Rd] R_alloc problems in R v1.11

2005-07-06 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, [iso-8859-1] Marie-Hélène Ouellette wrote: Dear Dr. Ripley, Or possibly other people on the list. I'm using the R v1.11 on Macintoch Unlikely. There is no R v1.11, and R 1.1.1 (following the most common misspelling) wasn't available for the Mac.

Re: [Rd] Problem with dyn.load...or else...

2005-07-06 Thread Thomas Lumley
in your DLL. This would narrow down whether the change of names is happening in R or in compilation. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] R_AllocatePtr

2005-07-19 Thread Thomas Lumley
s pointer object > is alive, the data and pointer will remain valid. But it > calls allocString() which is implemented using R_alloc(). Um, no. allocString is SEXP allocString(int length) { return allocVector(CHARSXP, length); } In fact the reverse is true, R_alloc is implemented us

Re: [Rd] Follow-Up: R on FC4

2005-08-01 Thread Thomas Lumley
l on FC4 with gfortran? > Try this again -- it is a random test. If it fails again then something is wrong. The tolerance on these tests is not very tight, certainly nowhere near rounding error. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] bug? (PR#8074)

2005-08-16 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just don't understand this: > >> (2*2)==4 > [1] TRUE >> .2*.2 > [1] 0.04 >> (.2*.2)==.04 > [1] FALSE It's a FAQ, not a bug. Consider: > (.2*.2) - .04 [1] 6.938894e-18 and read the FAQ -thoma

Re: [Rd] bug? (PR#8074)

2005-08-16 Thread Thomas Lumley
d; dd=d*d; if(dd==d) printf("Equal\n"); else printf("Difference=%20.18f\n",0.04-dd); } ------ prints [al:~] thomas% ./a.out Difference=-0.07 which happens to agree with the result R gives, though this isn't guarante

Re: [Rd] Memory leakage/violation?

2005-08-26 Thread Thomas Lumley
I can't reproduce this on R2.2.0dev on Windows XP (in a few hundred tries), or running under Valgrind on AMD64 Linux (in four or five tries). -thomas On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > Hi, > > I've spotted a possible memory leakage/violation in

Re: [Rd] Compile warning in unique.c

2005-08-29 Thread Thomas Lumley
ter, but for now that's almost certainly OK */ The warning is presumably because casting this int back to a pointer would fail (and is a common 32 to 64bit conversion error), but that's not what is happening here. -thomas __ R-devel@r-

Re: [Rd] .Call and Segmentation Fault

2005-08-30 Thread Thomas Lumley
exactly how it could be causing the problem, I would be nervous about having a C function called main() that wasn't the real main(). -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] 64 bit R for Windows

2005-09-02 Thread Thomas Lumley
ble to start *using* R > functions on objects of around 4GB. No, no. On *Windows* there is an address space limit of about 3Gb (and on other 32bit systems) On a 64bit system the limit is that a vector can't have length greater than 2^31, but this would be 8Gb for integers or 16Gb for d

Re: [Rd] .Call with C and Fortran together (PR#8122)

2005-09-05 Thread Thomas Lumley
ags that makes sure your definition of CG is used, but I don't know what it would be (and it's probably very platform dependent) -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Issue tracking in packages [was: Re: [R] change in read.spss, package foreign?]

2005-09-09 Thread Thomas Lumley
DESCRIPTION file giving the relative path to the file. This would mean that maintainers would not all have to switch to the same format. eg for foreign Changelog: ChangeLog and for survey Changelog: inst/NEWS This might be enough to make it easy for CRAN to display these when the

Re: [Rd] Issue tracking in packages [was: Re: [R] change in read.spss, package foreign?]

2005-09-09 Thread Thomas Lumley
e good reasons for having NEWS in the top level directory. Nearly everything that isn't an R package does this, because it's a useful standard. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Issue tracking in packages [was: Re: [R] change in read.spss, package foreign?]

2005-09-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
ally > the same. > In which case a Changlog entry in DESCRIPTION would be a very nice addition, and would have the advantage of not requiring changes to packages. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Issue tracking in packages [was: Re: [R] change in read.spss, package foreign?]

2005-09-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
is file, a path in DESCRIPTION seems a minimal change. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Issue tracking in packages [was: Re: [R] change in, read.spss, package foreign?]

2005-09-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
ould be nice. However, a URL facility is already present (and you already use it, and link changelogs to the URL, as do I). -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Issue tracking in packages

2005-09-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
file > is *optional*. And if the location really needs to be at the top, > then the build tools could grab it from there as they do the > DESCRIPTION file. We're certainly agreed on its being optional. -thomas __ R-deve

Re: [Rd] Issue tracking in packages [was: Re: [R] change in read.spss, package foreign?]

2005-09-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > On 9/10/05, Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: >>> >>> And one more comment. The DESCRIPTION file does not record the >>> location or existence of

[Rd] ptr_R_EditFile, R_WriteConsole, and R_ShowMessage

2005-09-12 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
ole (ptr_R_WriteConsole): This is a great callback. It will allow me to get rid of my hacky sinks (currently I use a sink to a file to retrieve the output). Even better would be an additional callback ptr_R_WriteErr. Is there any particular reason, why this does not exist?

Re: [Rd] ptr_R_EditFile, R_WriteConsole, and R_ShowMessage

2005-09-12 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
> R_ShowMessage (ptr_R_ShowMessage): > This one, too, seems to have very few use-cases (but at least some). Most > seem to be for errors during startup. > I wonder: > 1) If this callback is most useful during startR (...), can it even be used > in a meaningful way? After all, startR () also initial

[Rd] incomplete make clean for grDevices ( Windows only) (PR#8137)

2005-09-16 Thread thomas . petzoldt
Full_Name: Thomas Petzoldt Version: R 2.2.0 alpha OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (141.30.20.2) Symptom: If one moves a source tree to another drive letter, a following compile will fail when compiling grDevices. The bug is found on Windows only. Reason: When performing a "make

Re: [Rd] Typo [Was: Rd and guillemots]

2005-09-16 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The name of the "continental" quotation mark « is "guillemet". For anyone who is still confused: Left pointing guillemet (U+00BB) http://www.mathmlcentral.com/characters/glyphs/LeftGuillemet.html Left pointing guillemot (Uria aalge) http://www.r

Re: [Rd] Typo [Was: Rd and guillemots]

2005-09-16 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Thomas Lumley wrote: On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The name of the "continental" quotation mark ? is "guillemet". For anyone who is still confused: It should perhaps be noted that the Postscript name for the Unicode "Lef

Re: [Rd] as.data.frame segfaults on large lists (PR#8141)

2005-09-20 Thread Thomas Lumley
Under Valgrind on x86_64 I get ==27405== Access not within mapped region at address 0x33FFEFD8 ==27405==at 0x447045: Rf_substituteList (coerce.c:2003) ==27405== Stack overflow in thread 1: can't grow stack to 0x33FFEF98 -thomas On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote: [

Re: [Rd] Subscripting fails if name of element is "" (PR#8161)

2005-09-30 Thread Thomas Lumley
ause there is no other way to indicate that an element has no name. If so, it is a documentation bug -- help(names) and FAQ 7.14 should specify this behaviour. Too late for 2.2.0, unfortunately. -thomas Best regards Jens Oehlschlägel p <- 1:3 names(p) <- c("a&quo

Re: [Rd] access to R parse tree for Lisp-style macros?

2005-10-03 Thread Thomas Lumley
't have gensyms, but again, R fails to support these in a fairly fundamental way, so they have to be faked using variables with weird random names. I have a long-term plan to add real macros, but not until after Luke Tierney's byte-code compiler is finished. -thomas __

[Rd] Catching warning and error output

2005-10-10 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
ceed as in 2. However, it seems Rconnection and the related functions are too tightly guarded against this approach. I simply don't see a way, how I could fake this connection (but maybe there is one?). Maybe a public API could be added to allow this. Ok, so much on my helpless attempts. C

Re: [Rd] Catching warning and error output

2005-10-10 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
t about a direct call of REprintf. Such output would still be classified as "regular". Regards Thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] 8 char labels in read.spss

2005-10-11 Thread Thomas Lumley
y time soon. If you want to try, the current PSPP code is at http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/pspp -thomas > I did not have much time to search for the code but I found: > > in foreign_0.8-10 source file var.h.in > >> /* Definition of the max length of a short string

Re: [Rd] Catching warning and error output

2005-10-11 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
tests/Embedding, showing how this added API can be used to identify warnings and errors in the output stream. If you need any further comments / different format of patches, or anything else in order to evaluate this proposal, please let me know. Thanks! Thomas

Re: [Rd] Catching warning and error output

2005-10-11 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
fs in question: http://rkward.sourceforge.net/temp/classify_output_patch.diff http://rkward.sourceforge.net/temp/classify_output_test.diff Thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] 8 char labels in read.spss

2005-10-11 Thread Thomas Lumley
(Rice-Davis 1963) Unfortunately, that document is an old file format. It doesn't describe record 7 subtype 13, which is where the long variable names live. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] SPSS I/O dll was: 8 char labels in read.spss

2005-10-12 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Knut Krueger wrote: > Thomas Lumley schrieb: >> On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Knut Krueger wrote: >>> I found a definition of the SPSS files. >>> http://www.wotsit.org/download.asp?f=spssdata >>> but they recommend to use the spss input/output d

Re: [Rd] [R-gui] R GUI considerations (was: R, Wine, and multi-threadedness)

2005-10-16 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
ink you'll have a hard time, convincing any of the projects to give up their individualistic approaches (including any agreement, even on which programming language to use). All I can see is some projects might share some common standards. Regards Thomas __

Re: [Rd] [R-gui] R GUI considerations

2005-10-17 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
each other. Otherwise we'll once again end up in the discussion about the great merger of all R GUI projects, which I don't think will lead anywhere. Regards Thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

[Rd] RFC: API to allow identification of warnings and errors in the output stream

2005-10-17 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
it into several categories. I'll gladly provide more explanations or a different format of patches if needed. Looking forward to your comments Thomas Friedrichsmeier __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] RFC: API to allow identification of warnings and errors in the output stream

2005-10-17 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
r between two successive calls of R_tryEval. So effectively, I'd once again be back at 3a. Of course, if there was an API to efficiently set up condition handlers from C, and persist over at least one call of R_tryEval, I could in fact use that, and would happily do so. I have not found som

[Rd] on ptr_R_WriteErrConsole (was: Re: RFC: API to allow identification of warnings and errors in the output stream)

2005-10-18 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
iteErrConsole in windows for consistency's sake. But please: Don't conjure up a maintenance nightmare for this simple change. > d) There is an existing mechanism that could be used. If you want > file-like stderr and stdout, you could drive R via a file-like interface > (e.g.

Re: [Rd] on ptr_R_WriteErrConsole

2005-10-18 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
py to give it a try. Just send me a mail in this case. Probably, however, I would not be able to do this before tomorrow. Regards Thomas Friedrichsmeier __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Why no .Machine$sizeof.double?

2005-10-18 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Earl F. Glynn wrote: > Whis is there a .Machine$sizeof.longdouble but no .Machine$sizeof.double? > sizeof(double) is always 8 and sizeof(int) is always 4, because R requires the IEEE/IEC standard arithmetic types. R will not compile with any other sizes. -

Re: [Rd] Why no .Machine$sizeof.double?

2005-10-18 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Earl F. Glynn wrote: > "Thomas Lumley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Earl F. Glynn wrote: >> >>> Whis is there a .Machine$sizeof.longdouble but no > .Machine$sizeof.double? &

Re: [Rd] [R-gui] R GUI considerations (was: R, Wine, and multi-threadedness)

2005-10-20 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
rything going on behind the scenes, so you will be kept locked in, and helpless for ever? No. Should everybody be forced to use a GUI? No. Does anybody advocate otherwise? Not as far as I can see. I don't think there's anything more to be said on this topic. Regards Thomas Friedrichs

[Rd] [R-gui] R GUI considerations (was: R , Wine, and multi-threadedness)

2005-10-20 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
UsingTheInterfaceToR.html Main low level interface: http://rkward.sourceforge.net/development/en/documentation/api/classREmbedInternal.html Regards Thomas Friedrichsmeier __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] [R] unvectorized option for outer()

2005-10-30 Thread Thomas Lumley
s! I would agree. How about an oapply() function that does multiway (rather than just two-way) outer products. Basing the name on "apply" would emphasize the similarity to other flexible, not particularly optimized second-order functions. -thomas > Maybe

Re: [Rd] [R] unvectorized option for outer()

2005-10-31 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Liaw, Andy wrote: >> From: Thomas Lumley >> >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Jonathan Rougier wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure about this. Perhaps I am a dinosaur, but my feeling is >>> that if people are writing functions in R that might

Re: [Rd] [R] unvectorized option for outer()

2005-11-01 Thread Thomas Lumley
reArgs = list(x=2)) > list() > > whereas I would think 4 is a more logical answer. > I don't agree at all. The answer should be the length of the longest vectorised argument, and it is. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] A problem with glm() and possibly model-using functions in general?

2005-11-18 Thread Thomas Lumley
'formula' (see the help for 'formula()' for further details) and collected into a data frame. In your example the environment of 'formula' is the global environment, since that's where it was created. There isn

[Rd] Changes to Windows registry in R-2.2.0

2005-11-24 Thread Len Thomas
ctory and the user's home directory. The former may be available from the Windows Registry: it will normally be in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\R-core\R\InstallPath and can be set there by running the program R_HOME\bin\RSetReg.exe Perhaps I missed it elsewhere? Thanks for any help, - Len T

Re: [Rd] [R] computing the variance

2005-12-05 Thread Thomas Lumley
ariance is often to take the square root, and that using 1/(n-1) as the divisor does not give any particular optimality as an estimator of the standard deviation. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] 0/1 vector for indexing leads to funny behaviour (PR#8389) (maybe a documentation deficiency?)

2005-12-14 Thread Thomas Lumley
it and it worked fine. He must be wrong" -- a comp.lang.c standard It doesn't rule out the the possibility of the vector containing zeros, it tells you that you should not put zeros in the vector. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] 2 x 2 chisq.test (PR#8415)

2005-12-20 Thread Thomas Lumley
This is the same as PR#8265, which was reported two months ago by someone else from syd.odn.ne.jp. It still isn't a bug. According to Brian Ripley's response at that time, "almost all" the sources he checked gave the correction that R uses. -thomas On Tue,

Re: [Rd] Multiplication (PR#8466)

2006-01-06 Thread Thomas Lumley
mented and has been in S for a long time. -thomas Thomas Lumley Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Washington, Seattle __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] prod(numeric(0)) surprise

2006-01-09 Thread Thomas Lumley
rk, at least in the sense of getting matrices of the right dimension. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Issue with c++ .C call

2006-01-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
; done look at the definition of the class RcppVector in Rcpp.cpp Not at all. He is using .C, which passes a double * to the C function. You may be thinking of .Call -thomas > Dominick > > Sean Davis wrote: >> I am still having some difficulties with connecting R to a C+

Re: [Rd] Issue with c++ .C call

2006-01-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
oks as though there are problems with initialization like the ones you report, but in fact the function works correctly. If I compile without optimization the initialization looks fine. -thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Issue with c++ .C call

2006-01-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Sean Davis wrote: > > Thanks, Thomas. That did fix the initialization issue (or apparent one). > Unfortunately, the reason that I started debugging was for segmentation > faults, which have not gone away. However, it now looks like the problem is > internal

[Rd] [OT] GPL3 draft

2006-01-17 Thread Thomas Lumley
Since someone is bound to point this out soon I will note that a) A discussion draft of the proposed GPL version 3 is up at http://gplv3.fsf.org/ b) If you have comments on the draft, send them to the FSF rather than to r-devel -thomas Thomas Lumley Assoc

Re: [Rd] (PR#8500) standard install on OS 10.3.9 crashes on start without useful diagnostics (PR#8500)

2006-01-18 Thread Thomas Lumley
This won't actually help you at all, but I used the standard install on OS 10.3.9 (Powerbook G4) just last week without any problems. On the other hand, my install was on a machine that had previously had other versions of R. -thomas On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Rd] Minumum memory requirements to run R.

2006-01-23 Thread Thomas Lumley
anual it is admittedly less clear: there isn't a table of contents and there is nothing obvious in the index. To some extent this is a problem with all the manuals. The structure in the .texi file isn't translated well to HTML form by the makeinfo tools. -thomas __

Re: [Rd] Minumum memory requirements to run R.

2006-01-23 Thread Thomas Lumley
able while *not* having > an operational R installation... > Not necessarily. It's perfectly feasible to use a 32-bit build on a 64-bit machine, as it says in the manual, which is available from http://www.r-project.org whether or not you have an R inst

[Rd] Bug 16719: kruskal.test documentation for formula

2018-04-23 Thread Thomas Levine
I submit a couple options for addressing bug 16719: kruskal.test documentation for formula. https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16719 disallow-character.diff changes the documentation and error message to indicate that factors are accepted. allow-character.diff changes the kruska

Re: [Rd] Bug 16719: kruskal.test documentation for formula

2018-06-19 Thread Thomas Levine
Thomas Levine writes: > I submit a couple options for addressing bug 16719: kruskal.test > documentation for formula. > https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16719 > > disallow-character.diff changes the documentation and error message > to indicate that fa

Re: [Rd] Bug 16719: kruskal.test documentation for formula

2018-06-19 Thread Thomas Levine
Thomas Levine writes: > I have yet to find any example of my proposed changes causing a > regression. I believe that the most reasonable thing that it might > break is something that depends on either kruskal.test raising an > error or that depends on the specific text in the error mes

[Rd] Documentation examples for lm and glm

2018-12-13 Thread Thomas Yee
like in the lm() example. Rather than attached improved .Rd files here, they are put at www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~yee/Rdfiles You are welcome to use them! Best, Thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Documentation examples for lm and glm

2018-12-16 Thread Thomas Yee
think it should go a little further by actively discouraging its use in the first place. I do not wish to be contentious on all this... just encouraging good practice that's all. cheers Thomas On 17/12/18 12:26 PM, Achim Zeileis wrote: On Sat, 15 Dec 2018, frede...@ofb.net wrote: I agree

[Rd] configure script issue with -flto with recent gcc and system ar/ranlib

2019-04-24 Thread Thomas König
AR=gcc-ar RANLIB=gcc-ranlib ./configure --enable-lto so it is not a big issue, but it would still be nicer if the configure script tested the functionality of ar and ranlib itself and would select the appropriate one accordingly. This is with R version 3.5.3. Reg

[Rd] R problems with lapack with gfortran

2019-04-25 Thread Thomas König
lds it as a shared library. Offhand, I did not see any way to build a *.a file instead, so I could not use LTO to check for mismatched prototypes between R and LAPACK. Of course, I cannot be sure that this is really the root cause of the problem you are seeing,but it does s

Re: [Rd] configure script issue with -flto with recent gcc and system ar/ranlib

2019-04-25 Thread Thomas König
Hi Tomas, On 4/23/19 2:59 PM, Thomas König wrote: Hi, there can be an issue with recent gcc where the system-installed "ar" and "ranlib" commands cannot handle LTO binaries.  On compilation, this manifests itself with error messages claiming that they need extra plugi

Re: [Rd] R problems with lapack with gfortran

2019-05-03 Thread Thomas König
Hi Tomas, thanks a lot for your analysis. I have created https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90329 for this, and put you in CC (if your e-mail address for GCC bugzilla is still current). Regards Thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org

Re: [Rd] R problems with lapack with gfortran

2019-05-04 Thread Thomas König
back in the dark ages?). We're willing to do reasonable things :-) but so far all of the options we have come up with have very serious drawbacks (see the link to the PR at the top). If you come up with a suggestion, we'd be more than happy to look at it. I think the best option would

Re: [Rd] R problems with lapack with gfortran

2019-05-04 Thread Thomas König
Hi Steve, With the caveat that one may need to use the VALUE attribute to account for pass-by-value vs pass-by-reference. LAPACK should be all pass by reference, it is old F77-style code (except that the odd ALLOCATABLE array has snuck in in the testing routines).

Re: [Rd] R optim(method="L-BFGS-B"): unexpected behavior when working with parent environments

2019-05-06 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
It seems that it's an old bug that was found in some other packages, but at that time not optim: https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15958 and that Duncan Murdoch posted a patch already last Friday :) Thomas Am 06.05.2019 um 16:40 schrieb Ben Bolker: That's cons

Re: [Rd] Give update.formula() an option not to simplify or reorder the result -- request for comments

2019-05-27 Thread Thomas Mailund
no preference whatsoever. Cheers Thomas On 25 May 2019 at 00.59.44, Abby Spurdle (spurdl...@gmail.com<mailto:spurdl...@gmail.com>) wrote: > Martin Maechler has asked me to send this to R-devel for discussion > after I submitted it as an enhancement request ( > https://bug

[Rd] justify hard coded in format.ftable

2020-05-10 Thread SOEIRO Thomas
ults to c("left", "right") for backward compatibility. It could then allow: ftab <- ftable(wool + tension ~ breaks, warpbreaks) format.ftable(ftab, justify = c("none", "none")) Best regards, Thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] justify hard coded in format.ftable

2020-05-13 Thread SOEIRO Thomas
meant to be, but I'm not used to the R mailing lists... Thank you in advance for your comments, Best, Thomas > Dear all, > > justify argument is hard coded in format.ftable: > > cbind(apply(LABS, 2L, format, justify = "left"), > apply(DATA, 2L, form

Re: [Rd] justify hard coded in format.ftable

2020-05-14 Thread SOEIRO Thomas
course it's >> not meant to be, but I'm not used to the R mailing lists... > > well, there could be said much, and many stories told here ... ;-) > >> Thank you in advance for your comments, >> >> Best, >> Thomas > > The main reasons for &

Re: [Rd] justify hard coded in format.ftable

2020-05-15 Thread SOEIRO Thomas
in the documentation) would facilitate the reuse of ftable results for further analysis. Thank you very much, Thomas > If you are looking at ftable could you also consider adding a way to convert > an ftable into a usable data.frame such as the ftable2df function defined > here

[Rd] Patch proposal for bug 17770 - xtabs does not act as documented for na.action = na.pass

2020-05-21 Thread SOEIRO Thomas
na.action = na.omit) # group # a b # 1 1 The example works as documented if we change the code to: na.rm <- identical(naAct, quote(na.pass)) || identical(naAct, na.pass) || identical(naAct, "na.pass") However, there may be something I am miss

Re: [Rd] Telling Windows how to find DLL's from R?

2010-07-13 Thread Thomas Baier
y loaded DLL will be used instead of trying to load one from path. E.g. in your example: dyn.load("mypath/bar.dll") dyn.load("foo.dll") will work, as bar.dll (a dependency of foo.dll) is already loaded. Thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Plot window does not update in embedded code

2010-07-21 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
lways been the case? It was commented out for a long time, without anybody noticing. */ R_PolledEvents (); #else R_ProcessEvents(); #endif Regards Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. _

[Rd] Visibility of methods in different namespaces

2010-07-22 Thread Thomas Etheber
el" ) Everything works fine, when I load only one of the packages. But if I load both packages together, one of the calculateModel methods disappears and is no longer visible, which results in an error. What am I missing? Thanks! Thomas __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] R support for 64 bit integers

2010-08-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
Call forcing lengths and integers to be passed as 32-bit. This would mean that the code couldn't use large integers or large vectors, but it would keep working indefinitely. -thomas Thomas Lumley Professor of Biostatistics University of Washington, Seattle __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Re: [Rd] Non identical numerical results from R code vs C/C++ code?

2010-09-10 Thread Thomas Lumley
f you are not the intended recipient of the e-mail you may not use, disclose, copy, redirect or print the content. If this e-mail is not related to the business of UCT it is sent by the sender in the sender's individual capacity. ### ______ R-

[Rd] package test failed on Solaris x86 -- help needed for debugging

2010-09-16 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
to ask about a possibility to run a few tests on such a system: r-patched-solaris-x86 An even more recent version of R on the same OS (Solaris 10) and with the same compiler (Sun Studio 12u1) would help also. Any assistance is appreciated Thomas Petzoldt -- Thomas Petzoldt Technische Unive

Re: [Rd] package test failed on Solaris x86 -- help needed for debugging

2010-09-16 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
On 16.09.2010 17:05, Martyn Plummer wrote: Dear Thomas, Is this the deSolve package? http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-patched-solaris-x86/deSolve-00check.html I can help you with that. It does pass R CMD check on my OpenSolaris installation, but I am getting some compiler warnings. I

Re: [Rd] Summary: package test failed on Solaris x86 ...

2010-09-17 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
Bill Dunlap, Matthew Doyle and you (Martyn Plummer). I've also setup a new Linux test system, so that next time valgrind checks can be performed before package upload. Thank you! Thomas Petzoldt __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list

[Rd] Matrix install fails because of defunct save in require

2010-09-17 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
(save = FALSE) ERROR: installing package indices failed - possible reason: Matrix/data/*.R News.Rd says: The \code{save} argument of \code{require()} is defunct. Thomas Petzoldt __ R-devel@r-project.org ma

Re: [Rd] How to connect R to Mysql?

2010-09-17 Thread Thomas Etheber
I also had problems connecting via RMysql on Windows several weeks ago. I decided to skip the package and now use RODBC, which runs stable out of the box. Perhaps you should have a look at this package. Hth Thomas Am 17.09.2010 17:50, schrieb Spencer Graves: I've recently

Re: [Rd] Matrix install fails because of defunct save in require

2010-09-17 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
On 17.09.2010 19:22, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 17.09.2010 16:04, Thomas Petzoldt wrote: Dear R-Devel, I've just tried to compile the fresh R-devel and found that the install of package Matrix failed: - ** help *** installing help indices ** bui

Re: [Rd] Matrix install fails because of defunct save in require

2010-09-17 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
On 17.09.2010 20:04, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: I'm not sure why end users would be using R-devel rather than R-alpha at this point, but I have already changed R-devel to allow Matrix to get updated before it fails. Yes I realized the update and successfully recompiled it. Many thanks. "End user

Re: [Rd] Assignment to a slot in an S4 object in a list seems to violate copy rules?

2010-09-30 Thread Thomas Lumley
> Modified applydefine to duplicate if necessary to ensure that the > assignment target in calls to assignment functions via the complex > assignment mechanism always has NAMED == 1. > Yes, that was the one. It was reported as a bug back then too, and there was quite a bit of di

Re: [Rd] Will PrintWarnings remain non static?

2010-11-05 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
eciate if it could be promoted into the public C API. Regards Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

  1   2   3   4   5   >