Hello all,
I am wondering whether it’s at all possible to call a replacement function
in a custom environment. From my experiments this appears not to be the
case, and I am wondering whether that restriction is intentional.
To wit, the following works:
x = 1
base::is.na(x) = TRUE
However, the f
I think there isn't a way to make this work other than calling `is.na<-`
explicitly:
x <- b$`is.na<-`(x, TRUE)
It seems like a reasonable suggestion to make
b$is.na(x) <- TRUE
work as long as b is an environment.
If you wanted it to work when b was a list, it would be more problematic
b
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I think there isn't a way to make this work other than calling `is.na<-`
explicitly:
x <- b$`is.na<-`(x, TRUE)
Replacement functions are not intended to be called directly. Calling
a replacement function directly may produce an error, or may just
I was curious what R packages, or indeed any other applications, exist
to plot streamed data from arbitrary data generators. It need not
be publication quality plotting but it should be easy to use like
an oscilloscope. I was working on something called datascope that I
am using for 1D finite di
I think r-package-devel is a better place for this. CC'ing there.
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 at 23:50, Mike Marchywka wrote:
>
> I was curious what R packages, or indeed any other applications, exist
> to plot streamed data from arbitrary data generators. It need not
> be publication quality plotting bu
