Thanks Duncan. I can't tell you how helpful all your terrific replies have been.
I think the biggest surprise is that nobody appears to be using Java and R
together like I"m trying to do. I suppose it should be a surprise since there
are no books on the subject and almost no technical documentat
On 29/10/2017 7:26 AM, Morkus wrote:
Thanks Duncan. I can't tell you how helpful all your terrific replies
have been.
I think the biggest surprise is that nobody appears to be using Java and
R together like I"m trying to do. I suppose it should be a surprise
since there are no books on the su
Hey Duncan,
Since Java is the #1 language and R is extremely popular, I think the most
telling thing is that nobody on the "R-devel" forum (where people do
"programming with R") is doing R and Java like I'm doing: calling R from Java
and passing data structures.
So it appears I'm clearly pushi
The SJava package from 18 years ago did (does) have bidirectional calls
from R to Java and Java to R. So you are not pushing
the interface somewhere it doesn't want to go. But you are going about it
with strings and R syntax which is a much less powerful approach
than working with actual objects
Hi All,
OK, in the "back to the drawing board" department, I found what looks like a
much better solution to using R in Java. Renjin.
Looking at the docs and then trying a quick example, didn't quite work.
Of course I'm missing something.
Although I'm telling the engine to require ("biotools")
Please move this to r-help. It is clear that this is not a problem
with R itself, but with your ability to search the internet and read
the documentation and the code before posting.
On Sun, 2017-10-29 at 11:34 -0400, Morkus via R-devel wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> OK, in the "back to the drawing board"
Renjin is not R.
Renjin is an R language interpreter written in Java.
It has become exceedingly obvious that you are making user
errors. That's not a bug in the language.
If you want to use Renjin, there are mailing lists devoted to Renjin,
and also Stack Overflow and Renjin list questions th
Dear R Developers,
First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary
Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will
benefit a lot from his work.
However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R
Open Code shall be ported from R
User here: incorporating Intel's MKL, as MRO does, would be a very welcome
addition.
I was an MRO user before and it improved my experience with medium data
immensely.
They did, however, leave behind bugs here and there, especially related to
development with Rcpp, so I switched back to vanilla R
On 29 October 2017 at 22:01, Kenny Bell wrote:
| User here: incorporating Intel's MKL, as MRO does, would be a very welcome
| addition.
|
| I was an MRO user before and it improved my experience with medium data
| immensely.
|
| They did, however, leave behind bugs here and there, especially rel
10 matches
Mail list logo