Dario,
yes, that is a bug, now fixed.
Cheers,
Simon
On May 29, 2014, at 2:00 AM, Dario Strbenac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a minimal example that shows a problem I'm having with parallel
> processing.
>
> library(parallel)
> mcmapply(function(x, y)
> {
> print("Running")
> Sys.sleep(10)
Hi,
It may be my misunderstanding, but it seems that the "na.action" in the
princomp() function for principal components analysis does not work. Please
see this simple example:
u <- matrix(rnorm(75), ncol=1)
v <- matrix(rnorm(20), ncol=1)
x <- u%*%t(v) + matrix(rnorm(20*75),ncol=20)
x[1,1] <- N
Simon Urbanek skrev 2014-05-29 15:06:
Dario,
yes, that is a bug, now fixed.
Thanks for fixing it.
This problem was independently reported some time ago
(https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15016) and I
believe that it can now be closed.
Henric
Cheers,
Simon
On May 29
On May 29, 2014, at 8:04 PM, Henric Winell wrote:
> Simon Urbanek skrev 2014-05-29 15:06:
>> Dario,
>>
>> yes, that is a bug, now fixed.
>
> Thanks for fixing it.
>
> This problem was independently reported some time ago
> (https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15016) and I beli
Hi,
Recently I saw a couple of cases in which the package vignettes were
somewhat complicated so that Stangle() (or knitr::purl() or other
tangling functions) can fail to produce the exact R code that is
executed by the weaving function Sweave() (or knitr::knit(), ...). For
example, this is a vali
