> Hadley Wickham
> on Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:44:05 -0500 writes:
> Hi all, Because str uses the generic version of length and
> names, it's currently very easy to create objects that
> break str:
> a <- structure(list(1:5), class = "a")
> length.a <- function(x) 2L
Sorry to anyone reading this and being confused by my response: it was
meant to be a response to a different message.
Duncan Murdoch
On 13-06-19 6:53 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-06-19 4:44 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Hi all,
Because str uses the generic version of length and names, it's
c
On 20 June 2013 at 05:44, Tee-Jay-Ardie wrote:
| I guess I should start reading up on .Call.
If you look back into the R-devel archives as of a few months ago, a long
thread there came (fairly strongly and unanimously) to the exact conclusion.
With that allow me to make the case a little more s
Hello
My colleagues asked me to install "R" with module "shiny".
R version 3.0.1 compiled fine on Solaris 10 and is running well.
I tried to install "shiny". With the dependencies "Rcpp" should be installed
before. But the compile step did fail. See below.
The initial error message is "Err
> > These are obvious toy examples, but it is a real problem
> > if you want to create a class that defines names or length
> > in a meaningful way, that is incompatible with the
> > underlying data structure.
>
> Yes indeed, (and "well know").
> I'm arguing that in such a situation