Hello,
I'm trying to compile a library in MS Visual C++ using R.dll.
For that, I need R.lib for linking.
Where can I get it?
"Readme.packages" for R says: "First build the import library R.lib by lib
/def:R.exp /out:Rdll.lib"
But for this, I need R.exp, that is also not provided with R installat
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to compile a library in MS Visual C++ using R.dll.
> For that, I need R.lib for linking.
> Where can I get it?
>
> "Readme.packages" for R says: "First build the import library R.lib by lib
> /def:R.exp /out:Rdll.lib"
> But fo
I am having some trouble creating a hierarchy of virtual classes
(akin to the class structure in the 'Matrix' package). I think they
arise from my not understanding the best way to specify virtual
subclasses of a virtual class. please see questions below code.
setClass("mom")
setClass("ki
Dear Prof. Ripley,
thanks for your prompt answer.
But under MS Visual Studio there is no make utility (nmake is used to link C++
projects from makefiles).
So is it possible to create R.lib with MS Visual Studio or should I install some
other compiler for that (gnuwin?)?
Best Regards,
Juri
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Prof. Ripley,
>
> thanks for your prompt answer.
> But under MS Visual Studio there is no make utility (nmake is used to link C++
> projects from makefiles).
> So is it possible to create R.lib with MS Visual Studio or should I install
> some
>
I think it is just that you should bear in mind that your system is less
accurate than a more modern one (and lots of compiler bugs have been fixed
since gcc 3.2.3).
[I am surprised your sysadmins are happy running an OS that is lacking so
many of the security features of current Linuxen. Ours
Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you fixing rect?
Done now (-patched and -devel).
--=20
O__ Peter Dalgaard =C3=98ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark
Hello,
On Windows XP using R 2.4.0pat (2006-10-19 r39674) from CRAN (sorry, no
r-devel) R CMD check of R CMD build --binary fails if package has RCS
folder in data map. This does not happen on my Debian GNU/Linux box with
R 2.4.0 (2006-10-03). Is this a bug?
Here is the transript from the comm
Since Python has been mentioned in this context: Could not Python's
threading model and implementation serve as a guideline?
>From a few simple benchmarks I've run, it seems as if the Python
interpreter itself is thread-safe but not threadable. That is, when I
run something "pure Python" like a re
There are several sets of notes on threading off
http://developer.r-project.org page--somewhat old but still relevant.
The Python approach is discussed there. That approach, which gives
concurrency but not parallelism, is in principle fleasible for R but
getting from here to there is non-trivial
Dear all,
I am stuck with tracking down an error I get from R CMD check (Windows, R
2.4.0, same error for R 2.2.1): when running R CMD check over a modified
version of package relaimpo, I get the following output in install.out:
preparing package relaimpo for lazy loading
Loading required packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luke Tierney wrote:
> There are several sets of notes on threading off
> http://developer.r-project.org page--somewhat old but still relevant.
> The Python approach is discussed there. That approach, which gives
> concurrency but not parallelism, is
My original post got slightly messed up somehow, so let me restructure it in
order to make it understandable:
Dear all,
I am stuck with tracking down an error I get from R CMD check (Windows, R
2.4.0, same error for R 2.2.1): when running R CMD check over a modified
version of package relaimpo,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Ulrike Grömping wrote:
My original post got slightly messed up somehow, so let me restructure it in
order to make it understandable:
Dear all,
I am stuck with tracking down an error I get from R CMD check (Windows, R
2.4.0, same error for R 2.2.1): when running R CMD chec
> But it still remains to be seen whether the extra work to introduce
> threads is warranted. Will people actually use them in R and will it
> have a significant impact on the computations or simply make writing
> GUIs within R slightly easier to manage?
If threads can be set up easily, why not?
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
But it still remains to be seen whether the extra work to introduce
threads is warranted. Will people actually use them in R and will it
have a significant impact on the computations or simply make writing
GUIs within R slightly easier to manage?
I
This seems a lot faster than using the R sequence function. Suggest
that sequence be rewritten.
On 10/20/06, Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 12:51 -0700, Julian Burgos wrote:
> > Hello fellow R's,
> >
> > I'm sure there must be an easy way to do this. But after d
Full_Name: Luis Frank
Version: 2.3.1
OS:
Submission from: (NULL) (168.96.156.79)
Hallo!
In version 2.3.1 tha sort function applied to a vector trasposes it. This does
not happen in earlier versions. As a consequence, old programms don´t work in
newer versions.
Thanks!
Luis
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Luis Frank
> Version: 2.3.1
> OS:
> Submission from: (NULL) (168.96.156.79)
>
>
> Hallo!
>
> In version 2.3.1 tha sort function applied to a vector trasposes it. This does
> not happen in earlier versions. As a consequence, old programms don´t work in
> new
Hi,
I have a feature request for 'parse', and possibly the 'R CMD INSTALL'
command to display more informative error information. Specifically,
after making several modifications to a package on my system (the
package name is irrelevant; I'm using R 2.3.1 on Debian):
$ R CMD INSTALL seas
* Insta
On 10/20/2006 8:32 PM, Michael Toews wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a feature request for 'parse', and possibly the 'R CMD INSTALL'
> command to display more informative error information. Specifically,
> after making several modifications to a package on my system (the
> package name is irrelevant; I'm
On 10/20/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/20/2006 8:32 PM, Michael Toews wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a feature request for 'parse', and possibly the 'R CMD INSTALL'
> > command to display more informative error information. Specifically,
> > after making several modifications to
22 matches
Mail list logo