G'day all,
some time ago I sent an email regarding the following behaviour of
match.fun():
> x <- matrix(rnorm(200), ncol=2)
> var <- "fred"
> apply(x, 2, var)
Error in get(x, envir, mode, inherits) : variable "fred" of mode "function" was
not found
and asked whether it would be desirable to ch
Hi, people. ?alist says:
'alist' is like 'list', except in the handling of tagged arguments
with no value.
As written, this description is misleading. For example:
> list(e=3+5)
$e
[1] 8
> alist(e=3+5)
$e
3 + 5
We are not in the situation of tagged arguments
Full_Name: Renaud Lancelot
Version: Version 2.3.0 (2006-04-24)
OS: MS Windows XP Pro SP2
Submission from: (NULL) (82.239.219.108)
I think there is a bug in predict.lme, when a polynomial generated by poly() is
used as an explanatory variable, and a new data.frame is used for predictions. I
guess
> "Tobias" == Tobias Verbeke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Fri, 26 May 2006 16:42:24 +0200 writes:
Tobias> Dear list,
Tobias> In ?dimnames, section `Value' I read:
Tobias> For the '"data.frame"' method both dimnames must be non-null, and
Tobias> the rownames must be contai