P Ehlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I prefer a (consistent) NaN. What happens to our notion of a
> Binomial RV as a sequence of Bernoulli RVs if we permit n=0?
> I have never seen (nor contemplated, I confess) the definition
> of a Bernoulli RV as anything other than some dichotomous-outcome
>
Thank you for the answer. However, I sought in Doc. Writing R
extensions, in particular in the paragraph 5.6 "Calling C from FORTRAN
and vice versa" (page 67) but I did not find anything which could help me to
correct my code. Indeed, rmultinom.c is a particular function
since arrays are passed i
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> P Ehlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I prefer a (consistent) NaN. What happens to our notion of a
>> Binomial RV as a sequence of Bernoulli RVs if we permit n=0?
>> I have never seen (nor contemplated, I confess) the definition
>> of a Bernoulli RV
On 05-Feb-06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all
>
> A pragmatic argument for allowing size=3D=3D0 is the situation where
> the size is in itself a random variable (that's how I stumbled over
> the inconsistency, by the way).
>
> For example, in textbooks on probability it is stated that:
>
>
Thank you for the answer. However, I sought in Doc. Writing R
extensions, in particular in the paragraph 5.6 "Calling C from FORTRAN
and vice versa" (page 67) but I did not find anything which could help me to
correct my code. Indeed, rmultinom.c is a particular function
since arrays are passed in
Sophie Ancelet wrote:
> Thank you for the answer. However, I sought in Doc. Writing R
> extensions, in particular in the paragraph 5.6 "Calling C from FORTRAN
> and vice versa" (page 67) but I did not find anything which could help me to
> correct my code. Indeed, rmultinom.c is a particular functi
using R 2.3 of 1/31/06
> new("list")
list()
> new("list", list(a=1))
$a
[1] 1
> setClass("listlike", contains="list")
[1] "listlike"
> new("listlike", list(a=1))
An object of class "listlike"
[[1]]
[1] 1
Why does the list in the second construction lose
the element name? A workaround is to end
On 5 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I had a bumpy ride with this one.
>
> Ruuid/src/Makefile.win refers to src/include, which is not in a
> binary distribution so cannot be installed from an installed version
> of R 2.2.1. (That's a bug report.)
Thanks for the report, this has been fixed in
Full_Name: Alexander Holzbach
Version: 2.2.0
OS: Mac OS X 10.3.9
Submission from: (NULL) (129.13.186.1)
when i build an area with multiple diagrams (par(mfrow=c(1,3)) ) and try to save
this to a pdf via "save as.." or by setting pdf("filename") r crashes
reproducable.
___
On Feb 6, 2006, at 1:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Full_Name: Alexander Holzbach
> Version: 2.2.0
> OS: Mac OS X 10.3.9
> Submission from: (NULL) (129.13.186.1)
>
>
> when i build an area with multiple diagrams (par(mfrow=c(1,3)) )
> and try to save
> this to a pdf via "save as.." or by s
If one accidentally calls match(x, obj), where obj is any S4 instance,
the result is NA.
I was expecting an error because, in general, if a match method is not
defined for a particular S4 class, I don't know what a reasonable
default could be. Specifically, here's what I see
setClass("FOO", re
An S4 object is just a list with attributes, so a vector type. match()
works with all vector types including lists, as you found out (or could
have read).
If in the future those proposing it do re-implement an S4 object as an new
SEXP then this will change, but for now the cost of detecting ob
Paul,
On Feb 6, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Paul Roebuck wrote:
> Tried on R-Sig-Mac with no responses, but I need some kind of answer.
> [...]
> Does the following work on your system?
Interesting, no, it doesn't either. For png and pdf I use Quartz +
quartz.save (it produces much nicer results) so I d
Professor Ripley,
Following your advice, I am now using an updated version of gcc
(4.0.2 to be exact) as well as a true fortran compiler (XL Fortran
Compiler v10.1.0.0 from IBM). I am still experiencing difficulty in
running "make" after a successful "configure". Any additional insight
you
14 matches
Mail list logo
