R-help is not the list for R development questions: you didn't want help
did you? --> moved to R-devel.
I do wonder why
> sequence(c(0,-1))
[1] 1 0 1 0 -1
is considered useful.
Given that the definition seems flawed and I could not find any uses of
this function in any package my reaction
Paul Roebuck wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, John Chambers wrote:
>
>
>>Paul Roebuck wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Is it possible for S4 to (continue) dispatch to a class
>>>created during dispatching? The code below doesn't work;
>>>is this not possible or have I ommitted something?
>>
>>"doesn't work"? This i
I definitely agree that 'sequence' is not the right name
for this functionality. The functionality is occasionally
useful -- I've been asked for it several times. But I do
wonder if it is basic enough that it should be in 'base'.
The function could be rewritten to create the proper
length of the
On 7/22/05, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> R-help is not the list for R development questions: you didn't want help
> did you? --> moved to R-devel.
>
> I do wonder why
>
> > sequence(c(0,-1))
> [1] 1 0 1 0 -1
>
> is considered useful.
>
> Given that the definition seems fla
I'm not sure I understand here... If I do, say...
setClass("id","externalptr")
where classes of that type come back from, effectively, C functions
that do something like
PROTECT(ret = NEW_OBJECT(MAKE_CLASS("id")));
R_SetExternalPtrAddr(ret,myid);
UNPROTECT(1);
return ret;
am I just asking for
