Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 3/7/2007 9:47 AM, Thibaut Jombart wrote:
>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I may have found a bug in model.frame.default (called by the lm
>> function).
>> The problem arises in my R dev version but not in my R 2.4.0.
>> Here is my config :
>
>
> I don't see this bug in r40818 in W
Please update to the latest snapshot
R version 2.5.0 Under development (unstable) (2007-03-05 r40816)
where all is well,
Thibaut Jombart wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I may have found a bug in model.frame.default (called by the lm function).
> The problem arises in my R dev version but not in my R 2.4.
I don't see this bug (in r-devel r40818) but there are two changes between
40814 and 40818 that might have fixed it.
-thomas
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Thibaut Jombart wrote:
Dear list,
I may have found a bug in model.frame.default (called by the lm function).
The problem arises in my R
On 3/7/2007 9:47 AM, Thibaut Jombart wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I may have found a bug in model.frame.default (called by the lm function).
> The problem arises in my R dev version but not in my R 2.4.0.
> Here is my config :
I don't see this bug in r40818 in Windows, and the log entry for r40817
lo
