Re: [Rd] k means

2008-05-19 Thread friedrich . leisch
> On Sat, 17 May 2008 00:54:55 +0200, > cgenolin (c) wrote: > Hi the list > I try the flexclust, but I do not manage to see what is wrong in my > (very simple) code... > Will you have few minutes to check it? > Thanks for your help. > Christophe > --- 8< --

Re: [Rd] k means

2008-05-16 Thread cgenolin
Hi the list I try the flexclust, but I do not manage to see what is wrong in my (very simple) code... Will you have few minutes to check it? Thanks for your help. Christophe --- 8< data <- rbind(c(1,2 ,NA,4 ), c(1,1 ,NA,1 ), c(2,3

Re: [Rd] k means

2008-05-13 Thread friedrich . leisch
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 19:24:55 +0200, > cgenolin (c) wrote: > Hi the devel list, > I am using K means with a non standard distance. As far as I see, the > function kmeans is able to deal with 4 differents algorithm, but not > with a user define distance. > In addition, kmeans

Re: [Rd] k means

2008-05-12 Thread Bill.Venables
I would not support an extension of kmeans to do this. I think it is best left simple and fast as it now is. I can think of three ways you might handle your problem 1. Use, for example, pam() in the cluster package, which does a similar job to kmeans (not quite the same, of course) with a gene