> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Johnson [mailto:pauljoh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 11:17 AM
> To: William Dunlap
> Cc: R Devel List
> Subject: Re: [Rd] delete.response leaves response in attribute dataClasses
>
> Thanks, Bill
>
> Counte
Thanks, Bill
Counter-arguments at the end
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:15 PM, William Dunlap wrote:
> My feeling that everyone would index dataClasses by name was
> wrong. I looked through the packages that used dataClasses
> and saw code that would break if the first (response) entry
> were omitte
BCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On
> Behalf Of William Dunlap
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 12:57 PM
> To: Paul Johnson; R Devel List
> Subject: Re: [Rd] delete.response
I had noticed the same thing but figured that most
people (writers of predict methods) would be looking
up entries in dataClasses by name and not by position,
since predict's newdata argument need not have entries
in the same order as the data used to fit the model.
Hence the extra entry would not
