Re: [Rd] Suggestion: Not having to export .conflicts.OK in name spaces

2010-03-27 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
Hi. On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Seth Falcon wrote: > On 3/22/10 3:57 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>> >>> "SF" == Seth Falcon >>>     on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:47:17 -0700 writes: >> >>     SF>  On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: >>     >>  Currently library() and attach() fa

Re: [Rd] Suggestion: Not having to export .conflicts.OK in name spaces

2010-03-22 Thread Seth Falcon
On 3/22/10 3:57 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: "SF" == Seth Falcon on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:47:17 -0700 writes: SF> On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: >> Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an >> existing '.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name space, >>

Re: [Rd] Suggestion: Not having to export .conflicts.OK in name spaces

2010-03-22 Thread Martin Maechler
> "SF" == Seth Falcon > on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:47:17 -0700 writes: SF> On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: >> Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an >> existing '.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name space, >> unless it is exported. Since there shou

Re: [Rd] Suggestion: Not having to export .conflicts.OK in name spaces

2010-03-19 Thread Seth Falcon
On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an existing '.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name space, unless it is exported. Since there should be little interest in exporting '.conflicts.OK' otherwise, one may argue that those methods should look fo