On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:34:55AM +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> This was not implemented in R 2.9.x -- the comments in check.in don't
> agree with the usage, and it seemed unlikely that anyone really wanted
> this (it can be very slow, so perhaps a test at a time?), so this was
> intentiona
"PBR" == Prof Brian Ripley
on Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:34:55 +0100 (BST)
PBR> This was not implemented in R 2.9.x -- the comments in
PBR> check.in don't
PBR> agree with the usage, and it seemed unlikely that anyone
PBR> really wanted
PBR> this (it can be very slow, so perhaps
This was not implemented in R 2.9.x -- the comments in check.in don't
agree with the usage, and it seemed unlikely that anyone really wanted
this (it can be very slow, so perhaps a test at a time?), so this was
intentional (apart from not altering the reported usage).
I've added it back for 2.
