Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Matthias Burger wrote:
>> Hi Seth,
>>
>
[...]
>>
> I have just committed my variation of Seth's patch, so please check the
> current r-devel too.
For the record:
With R 2.5.0 devel (2007-03-18 r40854)
the issue I was concerned about has been resolved.
Thanks t
Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just committed my variation of Seth's patch, so please check the
> current r-devel too.
Thanks, Peter. And I agree that your variation is cleaner.
--
Seth Falcon | Computational Biology | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
http://biocondu
Matthias Burger wrote:
> Hi Seth,
>
> I applied your patch and the issues seems to be resolved. Now I just wait
> to see if all test case failures related to this disappear.
>
> Thank you for your kind help!
>
> Matthias
>
I have just committed my variation of Seth's patch, so please
Hi Seth,
>It isn't S4 specific. The issue seems more about anonymous
>calls/functions.
>
> ll = list()
> ll[[1]] = function(x) stop("died")
>
> v = try(do.call(ll[[1]], list(1)), silent=TRUE)
> Error in as.list(call)[[1]] == "doTryCatch" :
> comparison (1) is possible only for atom
"Matthias Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I understand I should have spent more time trimming my example
> to the minimal required code. Again this piece was copied & reduced.
No need to have done anything differently. I commented on the code
in hopes that it might be helpful for othe
This is off-topic, but since the discussion moved towards coding
style... Here are some comments on S4 style.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> ## using S4 classes and methods
> setClass("fooBase",
> representation("VIRTUAL",
> width = "numeric",
>
> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:09:00 +0100 writes:
PD> Seth Falcon wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>>> Investigating this new implementation I come across an issue in
>>> conjuntion with using S4 classes and methods. t
Seth Falcon wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> Investigating this new implementation I come across an issue in
>> conjuntion with using S4 classes and methods. try(expr) does not return an
>> object with attribute 'try-error' in case of method dispatch failure
>> in the wrapped expression w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Investigating this new implementation I come across an issue in
> conjuntion with using S4 classes and methods. try(expr) does not return an
> object with attribute 'try-error' in case of method dispatch failure
> in the wrapped expression which to me seems not
> quite c
