On 18/08/2009 9:53 AM, Jeffrey J. Hallman wrote:
replying to myself here, in lieu of replying to several others
jhall...@frb.gov (Jeffrey J. Hallman) writes:
One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper functions
like this:
void fameInit(int *status){
cfmini(status);
replying to myself here, in lieu of replying to several others
jhall...@frb.gov (Jeffrey J. Hallman) writes:
> One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper functions
> like this:
>
> void fameInit(int *status){
> cfmini(status);
> return;
> }
>
> when I want to call a l
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jeffrey J. Hallman wrote:
> One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper functions
> like this:
>
> void fameInit(int *status){
> cfmini(status);
> return;
> }
>
> when I want to call a library function (cfmini, in this case) that takes an
>
On 17/08/2009 10:23 AM, Jeffrey J. Hallman wrote:
One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper functions
like this:
void fameInit(int *status){
cfmini(status);
return;
}
when I want to call a library function (cfmini, in this case) that takes an
int argument. The .C
Jeff,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 10:23 , Jeffrey J. Hallman wrote:
One hassle I could do without is the necessity of writing C wrapper
functions
like this:
void fameInit(int *status){
cfmini(status);
return;
}
when I want to call a library function (cfmini, in this case) that
takes an
int argu
