Re: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS)

2008-09-30 Thread John Fox
Dear Jeroen, > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jeroen Ooms > Sent: September-30-08 3:10 PM > To: r-devel@r-project.org > Subject: Re: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS) > > > Sorry for p

Re: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS)

2008-09-30 Thread Jeroen Ooms
> -----Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On >> Behalf Of Jeroen Ooms >> Sent: September-30-08 9:28 AM >> To: r-devel@r-project.org >> Subject: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS) >> >

Re: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS)

2008-09-30 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Jeroen Ooms wrote: > I would like to do a SS type III analysis on a proportional odds logistic > regression model. I use drop1(), but dropterm() shows the same behaviour. It > works as expected for regular main effects models, however when the model > includes an interaction effect it seems to have

Re: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS)

2008-09-30 Thread John Fox
jfox > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jeroen Ooms > Sent: September-30-08 9:28 AM > To: r-devel@r-project.org > Subject: [Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS) > > > I would like to

[Rd] weird behavior of drop1() for polr models (MASS)

2008-09-30 Thread Jeroen Ooms
I would like to do a SS type III analysis on a proportional odds logistic regression model. I use drop1(), but dropterm() shows the same behaviour. It works as expected for regular main effects models, however when the model includes an interaction effect it seems to have problems with matching th