On 02/14/2011 02:59 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Paul Murrell wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 15/02/2011 8:11 a.m., Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>>>
Paul Murrell auckland.ac.nz> writes:
>
> Hi
>
>>>
On Feb 14, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Paul Murrell wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 15/02/2011 8:11 a.m., Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Murrell auckland.ac.nz> writes:
>>>
Hi
On 12/02/2011 7:22 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote:
> Hello,
Hi
On 15/02/2011 8:11 a.m., Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
Paul Murrell auckland.ac.nz> writes:
Hi
On 12/02/2011 7:22 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote:
Hello, that appears to have fixed it. Thank you very much.
I can now repeat the reported workflow and
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
> Paul Murrell auckland.ac.nz> writes:
>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 12/02/2011 7:22 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote:
>>> Hello, that appears to have fixed it. Thank you very much.
>>>
>>> I can now repeat the reported workflow and the image appears on the
>>
On 14 February 2011 18:26, Ben Bolker wrote:
> Paul Murrell auckland.ac.nz> writes:
>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 12/02/2011 7:22 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote:
>> > Hello, that appears to have fixed it. Thank you very much.
>> >
>> > I can now repeat the reported workflow and the image appears on the
>> > fi
Paul Murrell auckland.ac.nz> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> On 12/02/2011 7:22 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote:
> > Hello, that appears to have fixed it. Thank you very much.
> >
> > I can now repeat the reported workflow and the image appears on the
> > fifth (and subsequent) calls.
>
> Great. Thanks for chec
Hi
On 12/02/2011 7:22 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote:
Hello, that appears to have fixed it. Thank you very much.
I can now repeat the reported workflow and the image appears on the
fifth (and subsequent) calls.
Great. Thanks for checking.
Paul
Cheers, Mike.
sessionInfo()
R version 2.13.0 Un
Hello, that appears to have fixed it. Thank you very much.
I can now repeat the reported workflow and the image appears on the
fifth (and subsequent) calls.
Cheers, Mike.
sessionInfo()
R version 2.13.0 Under development (unstable) (2011-02-11 r54330)
Platform: x86_64-pc-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
lo
Hi
Just committed another fix that solves this problem for me at least. If
you want to test for yourself, the magic revision number that you are
looking for is r54330.
Thanks again for your help.
Paul
On 10/02/2011 7:54 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote:
Hello, I'm afraid the SDI graphics issue
Hi
On 10/02/2011 7:54 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote:
Hello, I'm afraid the SDI graphics issue is still a problem in 2.13.0
2011-02-09 r54308.
Bother. Thanks very much for testing. I'll keep looking.
Paul
To reproduce, in a fresh R session (Windows in SDI mode):
## create a dummy dataset
m<-
Hello, I'm afraid the SDI graphics issue is still a problem in 2.13.0
2011-02-09 r54308.
To reproduce, in a fresh R session (Windows in SDI mode):
## create a dummy dataset
m<- matrix(c(0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8), 2, 2)
## simple helper function to open the windows() device and plot the matrix
draw.f<-
Dear all,
Back when grid.raster() was introduced, it was suggested that perhaps
grid.rect() could use grid.raster() in case of even spacing. The
response at the time was that it would be best to keep the two
functions separate at a lower level, that is grid.rect() and
grid.raster(), but perhaps a
Regarding the SDI problem, I'll check that as soon as the next
snapshot build of 2.13.0 is available from CRAN (probably a few days
from now, unless I can manage to compile it myself).
Cheers, Mike.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-02-09 03:09 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Simon Urbanek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Simon Urbanek
>>> wrote:
Ben,
>>>
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Simon Urbanek
>> wrote:
>>> Ben,
>>>
>>> I have committed something analogous to R-devel (your rotation code was not
>>> unlike mine, I replicated t
On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Simon Urbanek
> wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> I have committed something analogous to R-devel (your rotation code was not
>> unlike mine, I replicated the color handling from R internals to be
>> consistent, I fixed
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I have committed something analogous to R-devel (your rotation code was not
> unlike mine, I replicated the color handling from R internals to be
> consistent, I fixed the drawing limits and added a check for x/y
> conformance). N
Ben,
I have committed something analogous to R-devel (your rotation code was not
unlike mine, I replicated the color handling from R internals to be consistent,
I fixed the drawing limits and added a check for x/y conformance). Note that
useRaster can only be used when x, y form a regular grid.
On 11-02-08 10:03 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> Ben,
>
> did you actually look at the result of your function with useRaster=TRUE ? ;)
> [Hint: don't use an image that is symmetric]
>
> Apart from that nice bug there are more issues as well, try
> image(matrix(1:4,2),col=1:3)
> The underlying issue
Hi
On 9/02/2011 3:51 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote:
Hello,
There's a problem for rasterImage when used in SDI mode in Windows,
which may be worth considering.
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/2010-July/008820.html
I had off-list emails with Duncan Murdoch and Paul Murrell about this
and
Ben,
did you actually look at the result of your function with useRaster=TRUE ? ;)
[Hint: don't use an image that is symmetric]
Apart from that nice bug there are more issues as well, try
image(matrix(1:4,2),col=1:3)
The underlying issue is that as.raster() is not quite what you would hope.
Unf
Hello,
There's a problem for rasterImage when used in SDI mode in Windows,
which may be worth considering.
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/2010-July/008820.html
I had off-list emails with Duncan Murdoch and Paul Murrell about this
and they determined that it was in SDI only, and there's
Has anyone yet tried incorporating rasterImage into the base image()
function? It seems to make a *huge* difference, with
a very small number of added/changed lines of code. (Of course I have
barely tested it at all.)
Is there any reason this *shouldn't* go into the next release?
> source("
23 matches
Mail list logo
