Bill,
Thanks. The problem is common but not consistent on update. I'll
wait a few days for packages to be updated at CRAN, then try it.
Mike
On Wed, 12 May 2010 08:49:42 -0700, "William Dunlap"
wrote:
> If you have the time and can consistently reproduce
>this problem you might try using S
On 12/05/2010 12:42 PM, Mike Prager wrote:
Shortened a bit further. Answers to queries are at the end. MHP
Duncan Murdoch wrote on 5/11/2010 7:03 PM:
> On 11/05/2010 6:21 PM, Mike Prager wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:05:45 -0400, Duncan Murdoch
>> wrote:
>>> I'd appreciate it if you could c
Shortened a bit further. Answers to queries are at the end. MHP
Duncan Murdoch wrote on 5/11/2010 7:03 PM:
On 11/05/2010 6:21 PM, Mike Prager wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:05:45 -0400, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
I'd appreciate it if you could check whether the problems remain in
R-devel, revision
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Mike Prager
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 3:21 PM
> To: r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [Rd] update.packages fails w
On 11/05/2010 6:21 PM, Mike Prager wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:05:45 -0400, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
I'd appreciate it if you could check whether the problems remain in
R-devel, revision 51980 or later. (A build of this revision should be
on CRAN by tomorrow, at
http://cran.r-project.org/
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:05:45 -0400, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>I'd appreciate it if you could check whether the problems remain in
>R-devel, revision 51980 or later. (A build of this revision should be
>on CRAN by tomorrow, at
>http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rdevel.html .)
>
Thanks fo
e changes, but I have no idea if they are effective.
Duncan Murdoch
>
> Georgi Boshnakov
> Univeristy of Manchester
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 00:07:50 -0400
> From: Mike Prager
>
On May 11, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Georgi Boshnakov wrote:
> I posted a similar problem to this list but had no response.
> The full email is copied below.
Well, things sometimes just fly by
>
> In a nutshell, I traced the message to normalizePath,
> which issues it. The directory does not exis
[Rd] update.packages fails with directory not found
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Windows XP. I have just updated to R 2.11.0 and then run
update.packages. In the series of updates, a few will succeed, then I
get a failure like
package 'mvtnorm' successfully
directory has been left behind?
Georgi Boshnakov
Univeristy of Manchester
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 00:07:50 -0400
From: Mike Prager
To: r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: [Rd] update.packages fails with directory
Bill,
Not in my case. The Indexing Service is disabled on my PC.
MHP
William Dunlap wrote on 5/10/2010 10:42 AM:
Someone once suggested this error happened was
due to the Windows 'Indexing Service' (sp?) delaying
the commital of a request to rename a directory
(so a subsequent request to use
[New material at end]
Duncan Murdoch wrote on 5/10/2010 9:33 AM:
On 10/05/2010 8:28 AM, Mike Prager wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2010 06:33:54 -0400, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>Mike Prager wrote:
>> Windows XP. I have just updated to R 2.11.0 and then run
>> update.packages. In the series of updates, a
ire, TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Mike Prager
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 5:28 AM
> To: r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [Rd] update.packages fa
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 10/05/2010 8:28 AM, Mike Prager wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2010 06:33:54 -0400, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>Mike Prager wrote:
>> Windows XP. I have just updated to R 2.11.0 and then run
>> update.packages. In the series of updates, a few will succeed, the
On 10/05/2010 8:28 AM, Mike Prager wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2010 06:33:54 -0400, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>Mike Prager wrote:
>> Windows XP. I have just updated to R 2.11.0 and then run
>> update.packages. In the series of updates, a few will succeed, then I
>> get a failure like
>>
>>
>> package 'm
On Mon, 10 May 2010 06:33:54 -0400, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>Mike Prager wrote:
>> Windows XP. I have just updated to R 2.11.0 and then run
>> update.packages. In the series of updates, a few will succeed, then I
>> get a failure like
>>
>>
>> package 'mvtnorm' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums c
Mike Prager wrote:
Windows XP. I have just updated to R 2.11.0 and then run
update.packages. In the series of updates, a few will succeed, then I
get a failure like
package 'mvtnorm' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
package 'party' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
package '
Windows XP. I have just updated to R 2.11.0 and then run
update.packages. In the series of updates, a few will succeed, then I
get a failure like
package 'mvtnorm' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
package 'party' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
package 'PBSmodelling' success
18 matches
Mail list logo
