On my Mac:
str(.Machine)
...
$ integer.max : int 2147483647
$ sizeof.long : int 8
$ sizeof.longlong : int 8
$ sizeof.longdouble : int 16
$ sizeof.pointer : int 8
On a Windows 10 machine I have, $ sizeof.long : int 4; otherwise
the same as on my Ma
Floor (maybe round) of non-negative numerics, though. Poisson should never
have anything after decimal.
Still think it’s worth allowing long long for R64 bit, just for purity
sake.
Avi
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:38 PM Spencer Graves
wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote:
>
> Cra
On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote:
> Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the sum,
> can you break your “big” simulation into the sum of a few smaller
> ones? Or is the order of magnitude difference just too great?
I don't perceive that as feasible. On
Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the sum, can
you break your “big” simulation into the sum of a few smaller ones? Or is
the order of magnitude difference just too great?
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 1:58 PM Spencer Graves
wrote:
> This issue arose for me in simulati
This issue arose for me in simulations to estimate confidence,
prediction, and tolerance intervals from glm(., family=poisson) fits
embedded in a BMA::bic.glm fit using a simulate.bic.glm function I added
to the development version of Ecfun, available at
"https://github.com/sbgraves237/E
Technically, lambda can always be numeric. It is the observations which
must be integral.
Would hitting everything larger than maxint or maxlonglong with floor or
round fundamentally change the distribution? Well, yes, but enough that it
would matter over process risk?
Avi
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 a
So imagine rpois is changed, such that the storage mode of its return
value is sometimes integer and sometimes numeric. Then imagine the case
where lambda is itself a realization of a random variable. Do we really
want the storage mode to inherit that randomness?
On 1/19/20 10:47 AM, Avraham
Maybe there should be code for 64 bit R to use long long or the like?
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:45 AM Spencer Graves
wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-01-19 09:34, Benjamin Tyner wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello, All:
> >>
> >>
> >> Cons
On 2020-01-19 09:34, Benjamin Tyner wrote:
Hello, All:
Consider:
Browse[2]> set.seed(1)
Browse[2]> rpois(9, 1e10)
NAs produced[1] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Should this happen?
I think that
Hello, All:
Consider:
Browse[2]> set.seed(1)
Browse[2]> rpois(9, 1e10)
NAs produced[1] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Should this happen?
I think that for, say, lambda>1e6, rpois should return rnor
Hello, All:
Consider:
Browse[2]> set.seed(1)
Browse[2]> rpois(9, 1e10)
NAs produced[1] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Should this happen?
I think that for, say, lambda>1e6, rpois should return rnorm(.,
lambda, sqrt(lambda)).
For my particular Monte Carlo, I have rep
11 matches
Mail list logo
