Hi,
I am not going to work out why you code crashes, but I did manage to
bypass dim checking some time ago - and as others had replied, it is
Not a Good Idea (TM) , as the check is there for a reason. If you really
want to do it, here is the relevant snipplet of what I did (oh, I did
copy insta
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Seth Falcon wrote:
> "miguel manese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I created an S3 "type" w/c is actually a list that should look like a
> > matrix but whose data is actually in an external file. The SEXP just
> > contains info on how to retrieve the data f
"miguel manese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I created an S3 "type" w/c is actually a list that should look like a
> matrix but whose data is actually in an external file. The SEXP just
> contains info on how to retrieve the data from the file. When I get to
> the part of creating the
Hello,
I created an S3 "type" w/c is actually a list that should look like a
matrix but whose data is actually in an external file. The SEXP just
contains info on how to retrieve the data from the file. When I get to
the part of creating the SEXP, I found out that SET_DIM & SET_DIMNAME
checks the
