On 10/25/19 5:20 PM, Wang Jiefei wrote:
> Thank you, Tomas. I appreciate your help. BTW, could you also add an
> explicit type conversion in " ITERATE_BY_REGION_PARTIAL" macro while
> you are fixing the bug? C++ compiler does not happy with the implicit
> conversion from void* to T* somehow and
Thank you, Tomas. I appreciate your help. BTW, could you also add an
explicit type conversion in " ITERATE_BY_REGION_PARTIAL" macro while you
are fixing the bug? C++ compiler does not happy with the implicit
conversion from void* to T* somehow and I have to redefine it before using
the macro.
Best
On 10/25/19 11:01 AM, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
On 10/23/19 6:45 AM, Wang Jiefei wrote:
Hi all,
I found an unexpected behavior when I was trying to use the macro
defined
in "R_ext/Itermacros.h" to loop over an atomic vector. Here is a
minimum
example:
C++ code
```
#include "R_ext/Itermacros.h"
On 10/23/19 6:45 AM, Wang Jiefei wrote:
Hi all,
I found an unexpected behavior when I was trying to use the macro defined
in "R_ext/Itermacros.h" to loop over an atomic vector. Here is a minimum
example:
C++ code
```
#include "R_ext/Itermacros.h"
#define GET_REGION_BUFSIZE 2
//Redefine the mac
Hi all,
I found an unexpected behavior when I was trying to use the macro defined
in "R_ext/Itermacros.h" to loop over an atomic vector. Here is a minimum
example:
C++ code
```
#include "R_ext/Itermacros.h"
#define GET_REGION_BUFSIZE 2
//Redefine the macro since C++ is not happy with the implici
