On 7/12/2005 8:58 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>> This is actually a Windows bug. Those files are unlink()ed, and it seems
>>> Windows is not respecting that (not an unknown phenomenon). I have tried a
>>> few workarou
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> This is actually a Windows bug. Those files are unlink()ed, and it seems
>> Windows is not respecting that (not an unknown phenomenon). I have tried a
>> few workarounds, and am about to commit one that seems to work.
>
>
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> This is actually a Windows bug. Those files are unlink()ed, and it seems
> Windows is not respecting that (not an unknown phenomenon). I have tried
> a few workarounds, and am about to commit one that seems to work.
I guess you mean the C unlink, since I don't see th
This is actually a Windows bug. Those files are unlink()ed, and it seems
Windows is not respecting that (not an unknown phenomenon). I have tried
a few workarounds, and am about to commit one that seems to work.
No files are left over on a decent operating system, e.g. Solaris or FC3
Linux.
: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 10:10 AM
To: Doran, Harold
Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [Rd] Sweave resource leak: leftover temp files (PR#7999)
One additional note: followups should only go to R-bugs if they have
the bug number on them (like this
Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/8/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We're planning (or in the process of?) changing the bug reporting
> > system, so this is only a temporary inconvenience.
> >
>
> I think these points have been raised before but, just in
On 7/8/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're planning (or in the process of?) changing the bug reporting
> system, so this is only a temporary inconvenience.
>
I think these points have been raised before but, just in case, some
aspects of this, if its changing anyways, that woul
One additional note: followups should only go to R-bugs if they have
the bug number on them (like this message does). Otherwise you end up
generating a separate bug report (PR#7999 was created in your reply to
my submission of PR#7998). Usually it's best just to cc R-devel, unless
you really
On 7/8/2005 9:36 AM, Doran, Harold wrote:
> This is great. Thank you for your help, but let me make sure I fully
> understand. Here is the looping file I use to subset the data frame,
> create a tex file, and Sweave it. This results in N number of tex files
> where N is equal to the number of rows
This is great. Thank you for your help, but let me make sure I fully
understand. Here is the looping file I use to subset the data frame,
create a tex file, and Sweave it. This results in N number of tex files
where N is equal to the number of rows in the data frame.
list <- unique(wide$stuid)
mas
Harold, I've taken a closer look at your example and I'd call this an
Sweave bug. It creates tempfiles each time you run it, and doesn't
delete them at the end. For example:
> list.files(tempdir())
character(0)
> testfile <- system.file("Sweave", "Sweave-test-1.Rnw", package = "utils")
> Sw
11 matches
Mail list logo
