Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>
>> Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>
If I were an Apple user (which I am not), there is a chance that I
might have my own gcc/gfortran in /usr/local and I surely do not
want R to temper with them. If you need ru
On Dec 19, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
>>> If I were an Apple user (which I am not), there is a chance that I
>>> might have my own gcc/gfortran in /usr/local and I surely do not
>>> want R to temper with them. If you need runtime libgfortran
>>> suppor
Simon Urbanek wrote:
>> If I were an Apple user (which I am not), there is a chance that I
>> might have my own gcc/gfortran in /usr/local and I surely do not want
>> R to temper with them. If you need runtime libgfortran support, you
>> should just bundle gfortran.so and gcc.so if necesary (th
On Dec 4, 2007, at 9:11 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
>> Because it *is* the gcc files? (Note the "/local" in the paths.)
>> Full R comes with GNU Fortran 4.2.1, because Apple doesn't offer
>> any Fortran compiler and most other Fortran compiler binaries for
>> Mac OS X
