Re: [Rd] Possible with enableJIT function

2017-06-14 Thread Berend Hasselman
> On 13 Jun 2017, at 22:05, luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote: > > Thanks. This should be resolved in R-devel(r72788) and R-patched > (r72789) > Also thanks. It is resolved in R-patched. Berend > Best, > > luke > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Berend Hasselman wrote: > >> >> >> In this email to the R

Re: [Rd] Possible with enableJIT function

2017-06-13 Thread luke-tierney
Thanks. This should be resolved in R-devel(r72788) and R-patched (r72789) Best, luke On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Berend Hasselman wrote: In this email to the R-help list: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2017-June/447474.html and in this question on Stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/

[Rd] Possible with enableJIT function

2017-06-12 Thread Berend Hasselman
In this email to the R-help list: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2017-June/447474.html and in this question on Stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44486643/nleqslv-memory-use-in-r Andrew Leach has raised a question about the memory usage of my package nleqslv. In a model