Re: [Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-31 Thread Paul Murrell
Hi Jeffrey Horner wrote: > Paul Murrell wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> Thomas Lumley wrote: >>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: There are several devices in packages, and this has been possible since at least R 1.4.0 (from 2001). There used to be gtkDevice (still on CRAN, but

Re: [Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-31 Thread Jeffrey Horner
Paul Murrell wrote: > Hi > > > Thomas Lumley wrote: >> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >>> There are several devices in packages, and this has been possible since at >>> least R 1.4.0 (from 2001). There used to be gtkDevice (still on CRAN, but >>> old Gtk), GNOMEdevice (never finis

Re: [Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-31 Thread Jeffrey Horner
Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 1/31/2007 8:49 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> >>> On 1/30/2007 8:50 PM, jtxx000 wrote: Greetings all, PGF is a package for LaTeX which works with both ps and pdf output without any nasty hacks like pictex.

Re: [Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-31 Thread Paul Murrell
Hi Thomas Lumley wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >> There are several devices in packages, and this has been possible since at >> least R 1.4.0 (from 2001). There used to be gtkDevice (still on CRAN, but >> old Gtk), GNOMEdevice (never finished) and an SVG driver >> (http:

Re: [Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-31 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > There are several devices in packages, and this has been possible since at > least R 1.4.0 (from 2001). There used to be gtkDevice (still on CRAN, but > old Gtk), GNOMEdevice (never finished) and an SVG driver > (http://www.darkridge.com/~jake/RSvg/)

Re: [Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-31 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 1/31/2007 8:49 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > >> On 1/30/2007 8:50 PM, jtxx000 wrote: >>> Greetings all, >>> PGF is a package for LaTeX which works with both ps >>> and pdf output without any nasty hacks like pictex. >>> Is there any technical reason

Re: [Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-31 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > >> On 1/30/2007 8:50 PM, jtxx000 wrote: >>> Greetings all, >>> PGF is a package for LaTeX which works with both ps >>> and pdf output without any nasty hacks like pictex. >>> Is there any technical reason

Re: [Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-31 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 1/30/2007 8:50 PM, jtxx000 wrote: >> Greetings all, >> PGF is a package for LaTeX which works with both ps >> and pdf output without any nasty hacks like pictex. >> Is there any technical reason why there could not be a >> PGF graphic device for R?

Re: [Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-31 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 1/30/2007 8:50 PM, jtxx000 wrote: > Greetings all, > PGF is a package for LaTeX which works with both ps > and pdf output without any nasty hacks like pictex. > Is there any technical reason why there could not be a > PGF graphic device for R? If not, I'm going to try to > throw one together.

Re: [Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-31 Thread Karl Ove Hufthammer
jtxx000 skreiv: > PGF is a package for LaTeX which works with both ps > and pdf output without any nasty hacks like pictex. > Is there any technical reason why there could not be a > PGF graphic device for R? Not that I can think of. PGF is certainly powerful enough for this. > If not, I'm goin

[Rd] PGF Device

2007-01-30 Thread jtxx000
Greetings all, PGF is a package for LaTeX which works with both ps and pdf output without any nasty hacks like pictex. Is there any technical reason why there could not be a PGF graphic device for R? If not, I'm going to try to throw one together. Any tips for getting started? Cheers, Caleb ___