Mike Prager wrote:
> Peter--
>
> Thank you. Am I correct in understanding, then, that,
>
> (1) The syntax I asked about is a special case, and the parser
> and/or dget() somehow recognize it as such, and
>
> (2) The syntax 1:15 (where 15 is the number of rows) should
> work just as well as c(NA,
Peter--
Thank you. Am I correct in understanding, then, that,
(1) The syntax I asked about is a special case, and the parser
and/or dget() somehow recognize it as such, and
(2) The syntax 1:15 (where 15 is the number of rows) should
work just as well as c(NA, 15)?
I ask, again, because I want
Mike Prager wrote:
> I am trying to understand why syntax used by dput() to write
> rownames is valid (say, when read by dget()). I ask this
> because I desire to emulate its actions *reliably* in my For2R
> routines, and I won't be comfortable until I understand what R
> is doing.
>
> Given data
I am trying to understand why syntax used by dput() to write
rownames is valid (say, when read by dget()). I ask this
because I desire to emulate its actions *reliably* in my For2R
routines, and I won't be comfortable until I understand what R
is doing.
Given data set "fred":
> fred
id
