> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Terry Therneau
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 11:32 AM
> To: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: [Rd] Anomaly in [.terms
>
>
> This arose whe
From the NEWS for 2.13.0-to-be
\item \code{drop.terms} and the \code{[} method for class
\code{"terms"} no longer add back an intercept. (Reported by
Niels Hansen.)
so it has been fixed, just not rolled out yet.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Terry Therneau wrote:
This arose when wo
This arose when working on an addition to coxph, which has the features
that the X matrix never has an intercept column, and we remove strata()
terms before computing an X matrix. The surprise: when a terms object
is subset the intercept attribute is turned back on.
My lines 2 and 3 below were