Thanks for the report and patch. Fixed in R-devel and R_patched.
Best,
luke
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, brodie gaslam via R-devel wrote:
>
>
> For what it's worth the following patch fixes that particular problem on my
> system. I have not checked very carefully to make sure this does not cause
> o
On 25 September 2018 at 22:59, mikefc wrote:
| Thanks Brodie, that's some nice detective work.
|
| If someone wanted to grant me access to Bugzilla, I'll be happy to post the
| bug and patch there (with your permission Brodie?) and help this bug get
| fixed.
I think it would help your cause if
Thanks Brodie, that's some nice detective work.
If someone wanted to grant me access to Bugzilla, I'll be happy to post the
bug and patch there (with your permission Brodie?) and help this bug get
fixed.
Mike.
On Tue., 25 Sep. 2018, 10:53 pm brodie gaslam,
wrote:
>
>
> For what it's worth the
For what it's worth the following patch fixes that particular problem on my
system. I have not checked very carefully to make sure this does not cause
other problems, but at a high level it seems to make sense. In this particular
part of the code I believe `mode` is taken to be the highest
Hi there,
using cbind with a numeric and raw argument produces an incorrect result.
I've posted some details below,
kind regards,
Mike.
e.g.
> cbind(0, as.raw(0))
[,1] [,2]
[1,]0 6.950136e-310
A longer example shows that the result is not a rounding error, is not
consiste
