Here is an example of the losing names problem in stock R 2.2.0. Note
that below, only stock R packages are loaded, and then I manually
source in just my dtk.test.brace.names() testing function, nothing
else.
Since the list-of-lists output of dtk.test.brace.names() is very
lengthy, I've manually
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:33:50PM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote:
> Proper R bug reports provide short "cut & paste" executable
> example code {i.e. no prompt, no output} or at least the
> transcript of such code {transcript : input (+ prompt) + output}.
My patch includes the function dtk.test.br
Andy,
that's interesting, but honestly your posting only *talked*
about your perceptions of bogous behavior of R and gave link to
a quite extensive S source file --- which re-defines basic
functions so it's not a file I'd just want to source into my R
session.
Proper R bug reports provide short
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
R, like recent versions of S-Plus, sometimes - but not always - loses
names when subscripting objects with "[". (Earlier versions of S and
S-Plus had the correct, name-preserving behavior.) This seems bad,
