Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Laurent Gautier a écrit :
Anonymous R objects, that is without an associated symbol in R, can be
passed to functions (and in that way makes a binding "take hold of R
objects without using symbols").
For example, building R code made of anonymous objects can be achieve
Laurent Gautier a écrit :
Anonymous R objects, that is without an associated symbol in R, can be
passed to functions (and in that way makes a binding "take hold of R
objects without using symbols").
For example, building R code made of anonymous objects can be achieved
by making a LANGSXP obj
Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Laurent Gautier a écrit :
It does not have to be a functional language.
To see it in use within a some-language-to-R bridge, you can check the
source in JRI, rpy2.
I can mostly speak for rpy2, and the way it is done there relies on
both R and Python's GC. Creating a an
Laurent Gautier a écrit :
It does not have to be a functional language.
To see it in use within a some-language-to-R bridge, you can check the
source in JRI, rpy2.
I can mostly speak for rpy2, and the way it is done there relies on both
R and Python's GC. Creating a anonymous R object presented
On Nov 28, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
FWIW what I think you should be really looking at is
R_PreserveObject/R_ReleaseObject.
OK. Thanks.
I would suggest looking at the many other R embeddings in other
languages that already exist since I don't think you approach is
very viable
