Thank you both for the advice. It sounds like we have a solution for
our next binary release of the beta package.
--Michael
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Another possibility is to link statically to libgfortran. That has pros and
> cons, but for libgfortran not man
Another possibility is to link statically to libgfortran. That has
pros and cons, but for libgfortran not many cons apart from space for
multiple copies in sundry packages (and is what is done on Windows,
BTW).
There are several ways to arrange that. As far as I recall I
temporarily removed
Hi Michael,
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:01 , Michael Spiegel wrote:
I am the guy who compiles the OpenMx binaries. We would be
delighted to place our package on CRAN, once the project is stable
enough so that we are comfortable releasing it to the larger
public. Let's try to track down where I
I am the guy who compiles the OpenMx binaries. We would be delighted
to place our package on CRAN, once the project is stable enough so
that we are comfortable releasing it to the larger public. Let's try
to track down where I made a mistake. Our Makevars.in file contains
the line:
PKG_LIBS=$(F