onsible for the bug. If you decide that it is necessary I can go
testing package by package.
Best,
///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\
Jose Claudio Faria
Estatistica
UESC/DCET/Brasil
joseclaudio.faria at gmail.com
Telefones:
55(73)3680.5545 - UESC
55(73)9966.9100 -
Best,
///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\
Jose Claudio Faria
Estatistica
UESC/DCET/Brasil
joseclaudio.faria at gmail.com
Telefones:
55(73)3680.5545 - UESC
55(73)9966.9100 - VIVO
55(73)9100.7351 - TIM
55(73)8817.6159 - OI
55(73)8129.9942 - CLARO
///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:50 AM,
install.packages(update[instlib == l, "Package"], l, contriburl =
contriburl, :
specifying 'contriburl' or 'available' requires a single type, not type =
"both"
Is it a bug?
Best,
///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\
Jose Claudio Faria
Estatistica
U
The
extra "\n" is located at line 142 of the current source function:
cat("\n", dep, if (do.trunc)...
HTH,
--
///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\
Jose Claudio Faria
Estatistica - prof. Titular
UESC/DCET/Brasil
josecla
his changes will allow to send simpler
instructions and
make nice and standard interfaces.
Is it possible to create the "new.line" argument and to put it and
"max.deparse" between the global options?
I would prefer not creating a custom version of source() because I
thin