Re: [Rd] Packages manually setting NeedsCompilation

2025-05-15 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 11:42, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 11:05 PM Simon Urbanek > wrote: > > > > Can you give an example, please? I wonder if there is a real use-case or > > just bad package design. > > The case that bit me yesterday was a Bioconductor package Rigraphlib, > s

Re: [Rd] Packages manually setting NeedsCompilation

2025-05-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 15 May 2025 at 11:41, Jeroen Ooms wrote: | The case that bit me yesterday was a Bioconductor package Rigraphlib, | see https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/src/contrib/Rigraphlib_1.0.0.tar.gz | | This package builds a static library entirely from a configure script. | Because there

Re: [Rd] Packages manually setting NeedsCompilation

2025-05-15 Thread Jeroen Ooms
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 11:05 PM Simon Urbanek wrote: > > Jeroen, > > thanks for raising the issues. Comments inline. > > > > On May 15, 2025, at 1:47 AM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > > > > R-universe builds and checks all CRAN packages on arm64 on Mac, Linux > > and soon Windows. It is important that we

Re: [Rd] Packages manually setting NeedsCompilation

2025-05-15 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Simon Urbanek writes: Re part II (CRAN packages which have NeedsCompilation: yes but don't really need it): I of course have code for this, last touched in 2016. Running the code (which currently only looks at having a 'src' subdir, based on one possible interpreation of it is normally s