On 10 February 2025 at 23:19, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
| The "naked binaries" are widely used, and therefore probably useful to
| many folks, me included. Some standardisation on paths would be
| incredibly useful, even if CRAN would not offer such binaries, other
| repositories could.
Sure, but naked
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 9:48 PM Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 11, 2025, at 5:23 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10 February 2025 at 07:35, Carl Boettiger wrote:
> > | Great discussion.
> > |
> > | Just to note another example I don't think was mentioned -- The r-universe
> > | p
> On Feb 11, 2025, at 5:23 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> On 10 February 2025 at 07:35, Carl Boettiger wrote:
> | Great discussion.
> |
> | Just to note another example I don't think was mentioned -- The r-universe
> | project also builds binaries for Linux (Ubuntu latest) https://
> |
>
>
>
> The proprietary Package Manager (PPM) from Posit (
> https://packagemanager.posit.co/client/#/) does offer binary packages for
> GNU/Linux, but the usage of this service is restricted in ways that go
> against the principles of open source (
> https://posit.co/about/posit-service-terms-of-u
On 10 February 2025 at 07:35, Carl Boettiger wrote:
| Great discussion.
|
| Just to note another example I don't think was mentioned -- The r-universe
| project also builds binaries for Linux (Ubuntu latest) https://
| docs.r-universe.dev/install/binaries.html (as well as other targets includi
Adding a different project to this discussion:
Recently at the R repository working group a project to provide them for
multiple distributions and toolchain was presented.
See the documentation about what do they (Patrick Schratz) share:
https://docs.r-package-binaries.devxy.io/index.html
The exi
Great discussion.
Just to note another example I don't think was mentioned -- The r-universe
project also builds binaries for Linux (Ubuntu latest)
https://docs.r-universe.dev/install/binaries.html (as well as other targets
including wasm). It also provides binaries for Bioconductor and packages
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 14:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> On 10 February 2025 at 11:00, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
> | Another argument to demonstrate the feasibility is the r2u project
> | (https://github.com/eddelbuettel/r2u). It offers CRAN as Ubuntu Binaries,
> but
> | in order to build these U
On 10 February 2025 at 11:00, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
| Another argument to demonstrate the feasibility is the r2u project
| (https://github.com/eddelbuettel/r2u). It offers CRAN as Ubuntu Binaries, but
| in order to build these Ubuntu Binaries it actually makes use of the binary R
| packages built
Hi Simon,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
- Original Message -
> From: "Simon Urbanek"
> To: "Tobias Verbeke"
> Cc: "r-devel@r-project.org"
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2025 10:33:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rd] binary R packages for GNU/Linux
> Tobias,
>
> although we did discuss the pos
Tobias,
although we did discuss the possibility of extending the
os/toolchain/architecture notation for binary packages beyond macOS, Linux was
not necessarily on the list as Linux distributions have already established
ways of providing binaries, so it does not seem productive to duplicate the
L.S.
AFAICS the Writing R Extensions and R Installation and Administration manuals
do not explicitly discuss binary R packages on GNU/Linux. Only installation
from source is mentioned
(https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#Installing-packages-1)
and when discussing repository layo
12 matches
Mail list logo
