Re: [Rd] 64bit integers

2025-01-25 Thread Simon Urbanek
Tony, Dirk sent a good response. I would like to add to that that it goes beyond just bits in SEXP: adding a new type involved in arithmetics is not only a lot of work but has performance implications. Also it is unclear how it should behave in the int32_t, double, int64_t triangle of vector cl

Re: [Rd] Depends: R (>= 4.1) for packages that use |> and \(...)

2025-01-25 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Kurt Hornik writes: Thanks again. All added now with c87633. Best -k > Ivan Krylov via R-devel writes: > Thanks. I am already looking handling the 4.2.0 placeholder syntax, but > likely will need to refactor the code I added yesterday. > The "experimental" 4.3.0 extra placeholder fe

Re: [Rd] 64bit integers

2025-01-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 January 2025 at 10:08, Tony Wilkes wrote: | I heard somewhere that Core R is developing the implementation of true 64bit integers. Would you have a source reference for that claim? | Is this true? If so, may I know what the status is of this development, and when, approximately, one can

[Rd] 64bit integers

2025-01-25 Thread Tony Wilkes
Hi everyone, I heard somewhere that Core R is developing the implementation of true 64bit integers. Is this true? If so, may I know what the status is of this development, and when, approximately, one can expect 64bit integers to be available in R? Thank you for your time! Kind regards, Tony