> Laurent Gautier writes:
> In case a search engine leads someone with the same issue here, I am
> documenting the point I reached:
> I can reproduce the issue with a small example when forcing R to not load
> any package at startup time (using an Renviron file):
> ```
> package <- "utils"
>
You can file it as a wishlist item in the bug trackign system. Without
a compelling case or a complete and well tested patch or both I doubt
it will rise to the top of anyone's priority list.
Best,
luke
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, Jan Gorecki wrote:
> Thank you Luke for prompt reply.
> Is it possible
In case a search engine leads someone with the same issue here, I am
documenting the point I reached:
I can reproduce the issue with a small example when forcing R to not load
any package at startup time (using an Renviron file):
```
package <- "utils"
lib.loc <- ""
ns <- loadNamespace(package, li
Thank you Luke for prompt reply.
Is it possible then to request a new function to R C API "message"
that would equivalent to R "message" function? Similarly as we now
have C "warning" and C "error" functions.
Best,
Jan
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 5:25 PM Tierney, Luke wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Sep 2019,
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, Jan Gorecki wrote:
> Dear R-devel community,
>
> There appears to be an inconsistency in R C API about the exceptions
> that can be raised from C code.
> Mapping of R C funs to corresponding R functions is as follows.
>
> error-> stop
> warning -> warning
> REprintf -> me
Dear R-devel community,
There appears to be an inconsistency in R C API about the exceptions
that can be raised from C code.
Mapping of R C funs to corresponding R functions is as follows.
error-> stop
warning -> warning
REprintf -> message
Rprintf -> cat
Rprint/cat is of course not an exc
Finally read in detail your response Gabe. Looks great, and I agree it's
quite intuitive, as well as agree against non-recycling.
Once the length(n) == length(dim(x)) behavior is enabled, I don't think
there's any need/desire to have head() do x[1:6,1:6] anymore. head(x, c(6,
6)) is quite clear fo
