On 2/20/19 7:55 PM, Toby Hocking wrote:
Update: I have observed that stringi::stri_sub is linear time complexity,
and it computes the same thing as base::substring. figure
https://github.com/tdhock/namedCapture-article/blob/master/figure-substring-bug.png
source:
https://github.com/tdhock/namedCa
Dear Martin and Ben,
I agree that a warning is a good idea (and perhaps that wasn't clear in my
response to Ben's post).
Also, it would be nice to correct the omission in the help file, which as far
as I could see doesn't mention that a contrast-generating function (as opposed
to its quoted n
> Ben Bolker
> on Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:18:51 -0500 writes:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 7:49 AM Fox, John wrote:
>>
>> Dear Ben,
>>
>> Perhaps I'm missing the point, but contrasts.arg is documented to be a
list. From ?model.matrix: "contrasts.arg: A list, whose ent
It's not a problem per se to put additional information into class htest
objects (hey, it's S3 after all...) and there is a precedent in chisq.test
which returns $observed and $expected.
Getting such information printed by print.htest is more tricky, although it
might be possible to (ab)use the
> Marc Schwartz via R-devel
> on Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:39:45 +0100 writes:
> Hi,
> In follow up to the thread on R-Help yesterday:
>https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2019-February/461725.html
> I am attaching a proposed patch against the trunk version of
> Extract.Rd, with
> Thomas J Leeper
> on Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:21:21 + writes:
> Hi John,
> Thanks for your reply. Of course I could write a package and of course I
> would find that trivial to do. The point is this is a main entry point to
R
> for probably (at this point) hundreds o
