On 04/02/2019 11:34 a.m., Martin Maechler wrote:
peter dalgaard
on Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:48:12 +0100 writes:
> Does either of you have a patch against current R-devel?
> I tried the obvious, but the build dies with
> building package 'tools'
> all.R is unchanged
> ..
On 04/02/2019 10:48 a.m., peter dalgaard wrote:
Does either of you have a patch against current R-devel?
I tried the obvious, but the build dies with
building package 'tools'
all.R is unchanged
../../../../library/tools/libs/x86_64/tools.so is unchanged
installing 'sysdata.rda'
Error in get(met
> peter dalgaard
> on Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:48:12 +0100 writes:
> Does either of you have a patch against current R-devel?
> I tried the obvious, but the build dies with
> building package 'tools'
> all.R is unchanged
> ../../../../library/tools/libs/x86_64/tools.so
Does either of you have a patch against current R-devel?
I tried the obvious, but the build dies with
building package 'tools'
all.R is unchanged
../../../../library/tools/libs/x86_64/tools.so is unchanged
installing 'sysdata.rda'
Error in get(method, envir = home) : object '$.data.frame' not fo
I get the failure message. To be specific:
adcomp.git>R CMD BATCH --quiet test_nlminb.R
adcomp.git>cat test_nlminb.Rout
> f <- function(x) sum( log(diff(x)^2+.01) + (x[1]-1)^2 )
> opt <- nlminb(rep(0, 10), f, lower=-1, upper=3)
> xhat <- rep(1, 10)
> abs( opt$objective - f(xhat) ) < 1e-4 ## Must
On 04/02/2019 9:20 a.m., Radford Neal wrote:
I think you might want to just delete the definition of $.data.frame,
reverting to the situation before R-3.1.0.
I imagine the cause is that the list version is done in C code rather
than R code (i.e. there's no R function `$.list`). So an alternati
> > I think you might want to just delete the definition of $.data.frame,
> > reverting to the situation before R-3.1.0.
>
> I imagine the cause is that the list version is done in C code rather
> than R code (i.e. there's no R function `$.list`). So an alternative
> solution would be to also i
