The "Value" section in the documentation of stats::uniroot() mentions component
"init.it" of the returned result:
> "... Further components may be added in future: component \code{init.it} was
> added in \R 3.1.0."
I don't see "init.it" described anywhere in that help page. It is technically
Thanks as well!
I'm now getting how it's exactly matched, but it still "feels wrong".
Martins rewording is exactly what I meant/was concerned about.
My intuition would say that anyone using ff(x=, ...) would not intent x to be
matched to something else, but maybe I'm overlooking certain cases.
Any
> Michael Lawrence
> on Fri, 30 Nov 2018 08:24:31 -0800 writes:
> Argument matching is by name first, then the still missing
> arguments are filled positionally. Unnamed missing
> arguments are thus left missing. Does that help?
Thank you, Michael!
Unfortunately, it may n
